All SL showed was that Indian bowlers don't know how to handle a counter attack. No reason to believe Herath is as bad as our bowlers.Attacking =/= slogging. Defending will eventually lead to getting out unless you are really good defense wise (which this team isn't tbh). SL's second innings has shown that attacking is the better option which India obviously haven't noted.
Oh god not this logic againWhat was Harby up too? He hit the ****ing thing and even if he didn't playing for India you don't have the right to feel hard done by.
If anyone in this lineup can it will be there two.Rahane to do a Laxman imo
I'll fix thatI hope it's carrying the decaying husk that is Rohit Sharma's test career.
Get bowled and go loopy eyed? Possible.Rahane to do a Laxman imo
No reason to believe he's as good either. If you allow a bowler to bowl at you then yeah obviously they will look good. No one can guarantee how one performs when put under the pump. We just haven't put SL bowlers under pressure so we don't know how good or bad they are.All SL showed was that Indian bowlers don't know how to handle a counter attack. No reason to believe Herath is as bad as our bowlers.
Didn't get it. Is this a DRS comment?Oh god not this logic again
I guess just like if you play for NZ you don't have the right to complain about lack of test matches and good test series, because NZC is turning a test match vs. Aus into an ODI.What was Harby up too? He hit the ****ing thing and even if he didn't playing for India you don't have the right to feel hard done by.
Rohit was just being his casual lazy self with his foot planted on the legside trying to defend a ball pitched on middle stump turn to off. Saha got beaten in the air but he didn't quite look like he was trying to attack.Rohit and Saha got out while trying to step out, no?
India scoring at under two an over. They have been going on and on about aggression under their new leader as if they have invented the word, but when it mattered, they have caved in meekly.