Yes, and 400 was suggested as an achievable score in that first game and it was never a reasonable expectation. Saying that 320 was a par score was overstating things too. We did well to reach 300 from what I saw, but we've had that discussion already.Well yeah, you just said '400 my arse'.
I think I suggested 320-325 was par in that first game & it looks significantly tougher out there today.
Yip.We could easily lose this from here.
Neesham shouldn't be batting this low, he's not a finisher.Yip.
Neesh is at sea with the bat.
Then 4 & 6.Yip.
Neesh is at sea with the bat.
that's exactly what he isNeesham shouldn't be batting this low, he's not a finisher.
We've found that out time and time again in his short career.
Keep going :PThen 4 & 6.
^^^As I said...17 runs off one over...Come on Chigumbura, think, thinkBringing Panyangara back might prove costly to Zim. Spinners were doing excellent in the last few overs; Chigumbura could have tried Raza for one more over.
I maintain 320, even with hindsight. Not saying we bowled well or that Ervine wasn't good with the bat, but Zim cruised to that target, even with the slight stutter towards the end. But yeah, we've been over that already.Saying that 320 was a par score was overstating things too. We did well to reach 300 from what I saw, but we've had that discussion already.
He takes time to get set and can't get hitting big early on.that's exactly what he is
Agreed, NZ looked to be in 2nd gear thinking 300 would be enough and didn't push themselves for more.I maintain 320, even with hindsight. Not saying we bowled well or that Ervine wasn't good with the bat, but Zim cruised to that target, even with the slight stutter towards the end. But yeah, we've been over that already.