I heard it in this video at 7.15mins.
But tbf Mark Chapman did say "We think you'll be the first ever Englishman to win 5 Ashes series"
Even with another England implosion in the next test I think it all rests on Smith. He has role reversed with the old Clarke. If he goes big we have a chance. If he goes into God mode we win. The problem I see is that it still needs someone at the other end to do something. Which is why we are going to have to get the runs from the top 3 based on form. Rogers and Warner the only 2 capable right now. We need a 1/500 start in a game to really control it. No Jimmy at TB the best chance.IMO, it goes without saying that Clarke is a very, very fine cricketer
In fact, whilst I have never been his biggest fan, I have no truck with anyone labelling him a "great"
That being said, I am struggling to give him a rating of 1/10 based on his test performances in this series and that is only on the basis of him catching the team bus on time
In short, he has been utter ****
With or without Anderson, he needs to stand up if we are to have a prayer
The problem with this theory is that Australia's worst day of bowling was day one at Cardiff, when they hadn't batted yet. England batted very badly that day (Root aside) and were completely let off the hook by Haddin's drop and some really inaccurate bowling.There's absolutely nothing wrong with Australia's bowling. England has crossed 400 once in the series. Every single problem in the Australian team is a problem with the batting. The bowlers look tired because they're carrying around the sorry arses of the middle order on their backs.
If Woods out theyll probably go with Plunkett as I can't see them starting a debutant in a must win Ashes testWood might be in some trouble for the fourth test
https://twitter.com/Jesse_Hogan?lang=en
Scroll down his tweets.
Would have been samey with Wood though, really hope they go for Foottit, but you are right, they'll play safe with Plunkett. None of these guys are going to give much control though, Oz will be going at about 6-an-over, just hope we can bowl them out in 30 or less.If Woods out theyll probably go with Plunkett as I can't see them starting a debutant in a must win Ashes test
:-/ very samey attack.
He shows enough intent by saving 90 animals lives a year. Oh wait my wife doesn't read these forums, carry on.Bananaman has fans but does he show enough #intent for Boof. No meat shows a lack of intent imo.
It's nice that it's not us with all these BS stories about us.Just flicked on Sky and they're talking about unrest in the Australian camp as part of an up coming story. Is this genuine or is it people in the media having a waaaah about Haddin?
We don't know. Seems like it was being discussed but his withdrawal made they didn't have to decide till the next test. But by then they had gotten a free look at how well Nev could do. So I think that helped tip the balance. I honestly doubt they would have dropped him. On the precipice but would have survived.Does anyone know for sure whether or not Haddin was going to be dropped anyway before the Lords Test. He certainly appeared to be on the brink.
Rogers in an interview said something like "I'l talk about it after the tour" in an interview so it definitely caused some issues with the senior players at least.They confirmed he was going to be picked for Lord's. As a result, I'm not at all surprised or disappointed that they are some within the camp who are unhappy with the 'dropping'