dfrinku
U19 Debutant
I meant it as a compliment. I'm impressed.Let me remind you, you're posting on a Cricket forum too. You're not quite Marlon Brando yourself.
I meant it as a compliment. I'm impressed.Let me remind you, you're posting on a Cricket forum too. You're not quite Marlon Brando yourself.
bump. i do not know.Only one player in the history of the game has batted 100 or more innings in the top 6 and scored fewer than Shane Watson's mighty tally of 4 Test centuries. Name that player.
Alistair Campbell?Only one player in the history of the game has batted 100 or more innings in the top 6 and scored fewer than Shane Watson's mighty tally of 4 Test centuries. Name that player.
like, just reading it makes you wonder how it's even possible.Only one player in the history of the game has batted 100 or more innings in the top 6 and scored fewer than Shane Watson's mighty tally of 4 Test centuries. Name that player.
Was just about to guess himeven Mohammad Ashraful managed 6 tons
Yeah I looked it up as soon as I posted it. Only way I'm wrong is if he batted below 6 a few times....which would be weird.Looked this up yesterday. Morgie was right.
eight out of the fourteen were, yes, but can you name themHalf of them would've been at Perth in 06. Can only remember three of the dismissals in that game though.