I was there too tbf. Just with qualifiers.I could have sworn you were the one defending Ballance in the first test?
On display so far it would harsh to drop Nev.So are we all agreed that Nev offers more than Rad and should hang onto the spot?
They just showed the full replay. He landed his back foot about a foot inside the crease and then does this weird as **** kick out behind him. Legitimate, but no idea how/why he does that.Isn't that still of Johnson a backfoot no-ball?
Maybe wait a tiny bit longer to make a judgement. Like for instance when he's batted more than once and kept for more than one session.So are we all agreed that Nev offers more than Rad and should hang onto the spot?
we knew that like a year agoSo are we all agreed that Nev offers more than Rad and should hang onto the spot?
No need. He's always been a better gloveman and has had a much more consistent batting record at fc level than Haddin. The only question really was if he could make the step up. Now maybe he'll fall apart but nothing shown so far in his fc career or now his first day in the middle on the biggest stage in test cricket have shown there's much likelihood of that.Maybe wait a tiny bit longer to make a judgement. Like for instance when he's batted more than once and kept for more than one session.
pfft, devil's advocate stuff in an Ashes thread.I was there too tbf. Just with qualifiers.
And only because the criticism gets ridiculous at times. I don't mean to deny his glaring weaknesses, but he's not exactly Chris Martin. He does some things well too.
Tbf he's only really hit that absolute top speed in the last Ashes and the Centurion game AFAIK. Rest of the time he's just fast, rather than averaging 12 because no one can deal with the sheer pace, pace.Johnson still isn't quite at full pace yet IMO but that looked ****ing rapid nonetheless
Didn't watch the last hour where Cook and Stokes consolidated, but before drinks yes we were pitching it up. Starc seemed a bit patchy, especially against Ballance.What was Starc's bowling like ?
Was he on line and length.
Are the Aussie bowlers pitching it up more this game ?
It is almost artificial, because he's a different batsman to what he was a year ago.It's not artificial though is it? It's high because he got high scores. It's falling now he's getting lower scores. It's not like the high scores now don't count while he's having a tough patch