• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* 1st Test at the SWALEC Stadium

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Just give it away - go the larrop and get on with preparing for the next one. Trying to bat it out for as long as possible just gives England a greater sense of achievement when a wicket falls.
 

BeeGee

International Captain
Yeah that's exactly what I want - give the arbitrary benefit of doubt to one discipline. I don't care which discipline as long as the rules are consistent. As it stands we can have a Test match or Test series decided based on two identical situations resulting in opposite outcomes for completely subjective and essentially random reasons
The thing you're not understanding is that DRS is reviewing whether the umpire's decision is correct or not, NOT whether the batsman is out or not. The benefit of the doubt is only to one discipline. That discipline is the umpire's original decision.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's actually a shame because he is just about the biggest under-achiever that it has been my misfortune to seen in Aussie colours
Yeah, the worst ratio of ratio of talent: performance I've seen, right up there with Ramprakash. Even Hick played at least one consequential Test knock but these guys...
 
Last edited:

Riggins

International Captain
The thing you're not understanding is that DRS is reviewing whether the umpire's decision is correct or not, NOT whether the batsman is out or not. The benefit of the doubt is only to one discipline. That discipline is the umpire's original decision.
Yes I am actually aware of that. I guess I just hold the admittedly bizarre and unreasonable opinion that deciding whether an umpires decision is correct or not should be based on whether the batsman is actually out or not.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
All mental

He'd play Wood in a FC match next week and pummel him everywhere before getting out for 80
Nah, Wood is legit. Watson's FC average is 42, he ain't a gun.

Mental strength is also more important 'talent' than ball striking in test matches.
 

Niall

International Coach
:laugh:

Simon Wilde ‏@swildecricket 2m2 minutes ago
Englishmen to get Watto lbw in Tests Broad 4 Bresnan 3 Anderson 2 Onions 2 Finn 1 Tremlett 1 Wood 1. As for others, where the hell were you?
10 retweets 5 favourites
Reply Retweet10
 

Top