Spark
Global Moderator
That's legit one of the most baffling pieces of logic I've seen in a while. Are you one of those people who think that anything without a single number attached to it is meaningless?Your posts are honestly completely useless I don't know why you are making them
Do you not realise that you are directly implying that because there is no such thing as a "bowling quality" number, then all bowlers are absolutely equal in every way. Because by replying to my post in that way, that is exactly, unambiguously what you are implying.
Just because something cannot be described precisely as a one dimensional sliding scale going from good to bad does not make the concept of good and bad useless. In the context of a bowler, it's simply how likely the attack of which they are a member is to take twenty wickets. Notice that this makes it highly context dependent whether a bowler is "better" or not.