CaptainGrumpy
Banned
Compare Corey Anderson and Crowe as bowlers. Crowe wins. Its not even a debate.
Furthermore, and this will spark some heated debate, this current NZ ODI team is its best ever. Fact. Much like the 1970/80's West Indians will feature in their ATG ODI team so too will current NZ ODI players.
Batsmen responsible for that success like Guptill, Taylor and Williamson are a key component of that. So is the runs and striking of Corey and McCullum (and Ronchi before the WC). This pushes the ATGs like Astle and Crowe down the pecking order. That will cause no end of debate. Players are no longer assessed merely on their averages, but their SR's and ability to find the boundary. It is the McCullum and Maxwell era of cricket. Crowe would possibly have adapted, but he didn't do it at the time when he had the chance too. He was certainly a driving force behind the global evolution of the game with team selection and strategy. The modern breed have. Yes there are fielding rule differences, but even then. Williamson, Taylor and Guptill are ATG players. Guptill may get a few arguments that he needs to carry on his form for a bit longer, but he is the first NZ'er to hit 200, and he got a 180 odd in England a few years ago. The times are a changing on the NZ ATG front.
Crowe scored 4 ODI centuries. Test cricket was more his game, by his own admission. He spent most his ODI career not liking the fact that it was over restricted and he was supposed to score fast. He is on the record as saying that. When he was adjusting his game, he was struck down by injury and forced to retire.
Last edited: