KINGOFKINGS
Cricket Spectator
Sometimes I feel Marshall is highly overrated when people say he is beyond doubt the greatest fast bowler of all time.
3 Reasons :
01> He picked his 1st 5W hauls in 1983 and picked his last 5W haul in 1989. So apart from those 7 years at a stretch he wasn't all that good and its not that his teammates cut into his tally. He wasn't all that good before 83 or after 89 to pick any 5fer .....
02> He was MEDIOCRE in ODIs .... He had the worst strike rate in ODIs than his peers Lillee/Imran/Kapil/Hadlee/Botham and even someone like Greg Chappel struck better than him. His bowling avg in ODIs is close to 27 which is just BS for a guy who is beyond doubt the greatest fast bowler ever.
03> Bowling with 2-3 all time greats in your team gives u great advantage since new batsmen are mostly unsettled and they can fall quicker thus giving you chance to improve ur strike rate. That having said I am aware that Marshall used to take the order wickets more than Garner still the cushion was clearly there which others did not have.
Before someone points out how ODIs have changed since 92 lets not forget how awesome Lillee was in the 70s despite ODIs being so new. Thats how an all time greatest strike bowler adapts to a new format. Marshall in that era and STEYN in THIS era failed to do that ..... They are not even in the top 5 bowlers in the shorter format in their eras which to me is not acceptable when we talk of someone being the Greatest of All Time.
Lillee > Marshall anyday .... McGrath > Marshall too overall.
3 Reasons :
01> He picked his 1st 5W hauls in 1983 and picked his last 5W haul in 1989. So apart from those 7 years at a stretch he wasn't all that good and its not that his teammates cut into his tally. He wasn't all that good before 83 or after 89 to pick any 5fer .....
02> He was MEDIOCRE in ODIs .... He had the worst strike rate in ODIs than his peers Lillee/Imran/Kapil/Hadlee/Botham and even someone like Greg Chappel struck better than him. His bowling avg in ODIs is close to 27 which is just BS for a guy who is beyond doubt the greatest fast bowler ever.
03> Bowling with 2-3 all time greats in your team gives u great advantage since new batsmen are mostly unsettled and they can fall quicker thus giving you chance to improve ur strike rate. That having said I am aware that Marshall used to take the order wickets more than Garner still the cushion was clearly there which others did not have.
Before someone points out how ODIs have changed since 92 lets not forget how awesome Lillee was in the 70s despite ODIs being so new. Thats how an all time greatest strike bowler adapts to a new format. Marshall in that era and STEYN in THIS era failed to do that ..... They are not even in the top 5 bowlers in the shorter format in their eras which to me is not acceptable when we talk of someone being the Greatest of All Time.
Lillee > Marshall anyday .... McGrath > Marshall too overall.
Last edited: