paddymadlad
Cricket Spectator
I personally feel Australia, considering the number of times they have bailed them out in recent years.
I think England had a better tail during the rise to #1I feel Australia has had a stranglehold on this claim since I started watching cricket. Warne's 86 with the 'can't bowl can't throw' dude was so awesome to watch as a kid and it wasn't even bailing us out!
Also he was a nightwatchmen at the time but a certified number 10 scored a damn double century!
Ya their tailenders are nowadays at par with Watson and Haddin, if not betterAustralia's last recognised batsman is Shane Watson so it actually considerably improves once it gets into the tail.
In a perfect world we would have a test where a tail of Broad, Prasad, Southee and Shami are asked to save the match.Defo Sri Lanka. The best at what they do.
Would do well till dale steyn comes on and bop shami over his head.In a perfect world we would have a test where a tail of Broad, Prasad, Southee and Shami are asked to save the match.
Nah, 8 is not a tail-ender in my books, that's reserved for 9,10 & Jack for mine.Think its engurland tbh quite simply because they've got a batsman batting at 8.
Legitimately feel that apart from Lyon, all of Australia's tail could be good enough #8s.Nah, 8 is not a tail-ender in my books, that's reserved for 9,10 & Jack for mine.
On the OP, Australia by the length of the Cook Strait.