Apparently not.Completely D/L shafted. Presumably though the 3 seamers are effectively bowled out in one ball's time.
I kind of get it given we're seven down. You have to think that 24 balls ago if we'd got 20 without losing a wicket would that have been above or below par?How does 54 from 37 go to 34 from 13 ffs?
That'd be the dead even D/L target you'd presume, rather than -9.Would think we should need 25 at most off 13, think the target is a bit harsh.
Yep.I kind of get it given we're seven down. You have to think that 24 balls ago if we'd got 20 without losing a wicket would that have been above or below par?
I think we've accepted the search for NZ's post-Vettori ODI spinner will turn out like Australia's post-Warne spin cycle (with NMac being Lyon, generally reliable but prone to having the odd stinker).Serious question, was anyone expecting Santner to be much above turdbucket status as a bowler?
How does that work? In any other situation in a 46 over innings one guy is allowed 10 overs, the rest a maximum of 9.Apparently not.
NZ seamers not losing overs makes it a joke though.That'd be the dead even D/L target you'd presume, rather than -9.
Yep.
What the actual ****NZ seamers not losing overs makes it a joke though.
What do you plan to do about that though? Have Boult un-bowl an over?NZ seamers not losing overs makes it a joke though.
46 overs. 1 guy gets 10, everyone else gets a maximum of 9.I gotta say I don't understand what you guys are complaining about re: bowlers losing overs.
Works both ways, now Southee or McClenaghan can't bowl.NZ seamers not losing overs makes it a joke though.
People are complaining about the opposite. Cricinfo initially said that Southee could still bowl 10.I gotta say I don't understand what you guys are complaining about re: bowlers losing overs.
They got it wrong, looks like. "Grant Elliot and Mitchell Santner have come down the stairs for a few warm-up deliveries so it looks like those two will bowl the final two overs... " is the update from them.People are complaining about the opposite. Cricinfo initially said that Southee could still bowl 10.