No. Bangladesh is a much better side in ODIs nowadays.50 overs up, 225-0. This would be enough to beat them in an ODI.
Just like Vinay Kumar is the great-grandson of Kumar RanjitsinhjiKL Rahul
No matter how much you polish a turd etc etc.No. Bangladesh is a much better side in ODIs nowadays.
Nah. They do have some useful players now.No matter how much you polish a turd etc etc.
But we have 5 specialist bowlers to bowl 10 overs each too.No. Bangladesh is a much better side in ODIs nowadays.
Vinay Kumar is a namesake but no similar characteristic.Just like Vinay Kumar is the great-grandson of Kumar Ranjitsinhji
Indian bowling in ODIs will continue to suck.But we have 5 specialist bowlers to bowl 10 overs each too.
No. Bangladesh is a much better side in ODIs nowadays.
Nah. They do have some useful players now.
jono was wrong, your trash talking game is not just weak, it's non existentIndian bowling in ODIs will continue to suck.
Don't think KL Rahul has any similar characteristic compared to DravidVinay Kumar is a namesake but no similar characteristic.
... the souls of whimpering Bangladesh batsmen?Indian bowling in ODIs will continue to suck.
It's actually much better than our test bowling.Indian bowling in ODIs will continue to suck.
No matter how much you polish a turdIt's actually much better than our test bowling.
Good technique, sincere good Bangalore boys both.Don't think KL Rahul has any similar characteristic compared to Dravid
Disagreed. But it's like picking worse of two rotten apples.It's actually much better than our test bowling.
Ok then Wriddhiman Saha isthe son of Ganguly tooGood technique, sincere good Bangalore boys both.
Haha, this is actually true. KL can keep a bit.Why don't we just drop keep Dhawan, drop Saha and bring in Rahul Dravid's son as a keeper? I'm sure his dad taught him how to keep #WorldCup2003.