Usually goes massive too.That's it. Look Root in for a hundred.
Every test ton he's got since Headingly two years ago has been 150+Usually goes massive too.
Too sensible.Genuinely don't understand the umpire's call on hitting in line. It's either hit him in line or it hasn't! The hitting the stumps thing I get, there's a margin of error to consider. But if the law says any part of the ball hits in line, then that should be out. If the law says all the ball has to hit in line, it's not out. If the law says half the ball has to hit in line, then again it's either out or not. Does my head in....
yep.. The umpire's call business should only apply to the predictive part of the review.Genuinely don't understand the umpire's call on hitting in line. It's either hit him in line or it hasn't! The hitting the stumps thing I get, there's a margin of error to consider. But if the law says any part of the ball hits in line, then that should be out. If the law says all the ball has to hit in line, it's not out. If the law says half the ball has to hit in line, then again it's either out or not. Does my head in....
I think umpires call is more to keep the status quo of batsman get the benefit of doubt, rather than margin of error issues.Genuinely don't understand the umpire's call on hitting in line. It's either hit him in line or it hasn't! The hitting the stumps thing I get, there's a margin of error to consider. But if the law says any part of the ball hits in line, then that should be out. If the law says all the ball has to hit in line, it's not out. If the law says half the ball has to hit in line, then again it's either out or not. Does my head in....
Can you make a post about what you like about it in particular. Would value your viewMark Craig truly has a gorgeous bowling action. In fact our entire bowling attack are aesthetically pleasing. Great to watch.