• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* English Football Season 2014-15

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Well this may shock you but there are other clubs
There are heaps of foreign clubs he'd do well to go to, but people in this country just don't see it as a move upwards to leave Liverpool to go to some Spanish or German side who aren't those three. Same with pretty much all of Italy, France etc.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
With as much pulling power as Arsenal/City?
Well, if you look back I was merely saying Liverpool should aim to sell him abroad. My point is it doesn't have to be to one of the Classico giants or Bayern.

The bloke is under contract. Liverpool should do all they can to foster a move to a non-English side. If Sterling doesn't budge, see what happens. I imagine he'd get more money over here so would be reluctant...but it would be interesting to see whether Liverpool play hard ball.

The only way they could lose him for nothing would be if went abroad when his contract ended so they have little to lose by trying to force that situation. IMO
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
There are heaps of foreign clubs he'd do well to go to, but people in this country just don't see it as a move upwards to leave Liverpool to go to some Spanish or German side who aren't those three. Same with pretty much all of Italy, France etc.
And it's bollocks isn't it? I mean I think a lot of **** gets talked about what's wrong with the England team but I've no doubt our players would improve if they went abroad at a younger age. Not even because the coaching is better per se (though I imagine it is) but just for the whole experience.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Well this may shock you but there are other clubs
Those 3 are pretty much the only clubs in Europe who could afford Sterling. The disparity between what's on offer in England wage wise and the continent is becoming huge.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Well, if you look back I was merely saying Liverpool should aim to sell him abroad. My point is it doesn't have to be to one of the Classico giants or Bayern.

The bloke is under contract. Liverpool should do all they can to foster a move to a non-English side. If Sterling doesn't budge, see what happens. I imagine he'd get more money over here so would be reluctant...but it would be interesting to see whether Liverpool play hard ball.

The only way they could lose him for nothing would be if went abroad when his contract ended so they have little to lose by trying to force that situation. IMO
Why would they do that when they could just sell him?
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Those 3 are pretty much the only clubs in Europe who could afford Sterling. The disparity between what's on offer in England wage wise and the continent is becoming huge.
Juve could pay his first couple of years wages with their CL prize pot when they win it :p
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Liverpool should do all they can to foster a move to a non-English side.
I'm not sure if this adds up. It's like when Spurs sold Bale to RM, but then that just freed up Ozil to go to Arsenal. That's not a perfect example, because there were no players at Bale's level that Liverpool's rivals could get instead, but I don't think that's true here. Say Sterling goes to Bayern and Arsenal sign Gotze instead. Is it really that much different?
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Because you get £35m out of it.

edit: @Corrin. Ideally you want him to go abroad but I just don't see him going abroad.
 
Last edited:

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
And it's bollocks isn't it? I mean I think a lot of **** gets talked about what's wrong with the England team but I've no doubt our players would improve if they went abroad at a younger age. Not even because the coaching is better per se (though I imagine it is) but just for the whole experience.
100%. Would be really interesting to see him go to Bayer Leverkusen or Borussia Mönchengladbach, there aren't really any sides like them in England. Probably more chance of me signing for them though, and I wouldn't even be that surprised if some of their best players ended up going to Liverpool with the Sterling cash. Prem just has much more money and prestige in the eyes of everyone in England.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Or what if they sell to RM and it makes way for Bale to United. That's so much worse than just letting Arse have Sterling.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Doesn't seem to have worked out too badly for Arsenal tbf :ph34r:
I think people probably overestimate how much Wenger was forced on a lot of the high profile sales to English rivals. Certainly a lot of those transfers have failed to really benefit those clubs in the long term.

I'm not sure if this adds up. It's like when Spurs sold Bale to RM, but then that just freed up Ozil to go to Arsenal. That's not a perfect example, because there were no players at Bale's level that Liverpool's rivals could get instead, but I don't think that's true here. Say Sterling goes to Bayern and Arsenal sign Gotze instead. Is it really that much different?
Guess Suarez to Barca and Alexis to Arsenal another example.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I'm not sure if this adds up. It's like when Spurs sold Bale to RM, but then that just freed up Ozil to go to Arsenal. That's not a perfect example, because there were no players at Bale's level that Liverpool's rivals could get instead, but I don't think that's true here. Say Sterling goes to Bayern and Arsenal sign Gotze instead. Is it really that much different?
Because you get £35m out of it.
It's about so so much more than the money and the basic improvement of a rival though.

Granted, not on the same level by do you not remember how Heinze took United to court because Old Whisky Breath wouldn't let him join yer scousers.

It's about the message it sends as much as anything. Selling players abroad is all well and good, selling them to sides you aim to compete with sends a pissweak message both to those sides and to other players you're trying to recruit.

I mean I suppose you could say, well they did it with Torres but he was in decline (though it wasn't known to be permanent at the time) and they'd just signed Suarez. Aside from that I'm struggling to think of a time they've done it. I can't think of a time Man U have done it either.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
100%. Would be really interesting to see him go to Bayer Leverkusen or Borussia Mönchengladbach, there aren't really any sides like them in England. Probably more chance of me signing for them though, and I wouldn't even be that surprised if some of their best players ended up going to Liverpool with the Sterling cash. Prem just has much more money and prestige in the eyes of everyone in England.
Prestige isn't as important as cold hard cash IMO. He's rumoured to have turned down £100k a week, aside from the 3 clubs I mentioned earlier as well as PSG and Monaco I just don't see Sterling earning that outside of England.
 

Top