Spark
Global Moderator
a strong argument for the stars signing kp for another fifty seasonsThe worst thing I'll have to suffer through another KP publicity tour in 7 months time.
a strong argument for the stars signing kp for another fifty seasonsThe worst thing I'll have to suffer through another KP publicity tour in 7 months time.
Let me google that for youWhats the best first class score by an english batsman in county cricket? He should break that tomorrow and sign off.
And take 5 wickets just to really piss them offWhats the best first class score by an english batsman in county cricket? He should break that tomorrow and sign off.
Thanks. I refer to people like you as my google slaves ftr.
The sheer fact that they appointed Andrew Strauss to that role is a ****ing joke to begin with. Appointing a guy a couple of years into retirement who captained all of the senior players and opened the batting with the current captain? God, how daft can you get. Cook's going to struggle to put a stamp on the team even more now, because it becomes a continuation of the Strauss dynasty. The senior players don't get held to account because they're best buddies/former roommates with the Managing Director (or whatever his title is), and Strauss's well-known opinions of KP are going to kill any reasonable discussion of this issue stone-dead. I feel for the coach who accepts this job, they're basically doomed to fail from the outset.
Massive assumptions here. Let's hear what Strauss says todayand let's judge him in the job after more than a day.Yeah, what this 'decision' is telling me is that circumstances be damned, Strauss isn't going to put aside his personal feelings about players. Having a guy who was so close to the senior players and doesn't care about being impartial, in a high-level role that still remains close to the day-to-day running of the team, is seriously ****ing dangerous. Especially when he seems to be so bloody ideological in his decision.
Strauss should have been a Tory MP after all. Would fit right in.
the condescending google link didn't even give the answer anyway.Thanks. I refer to people like you as my google slaves ftr.
Was that on Full Toss or a newspaper? That site is so depressing - and yet it sums up how a lot of people feel. More often than not their doom and gloom predictions are right as well.A measured response from an England fan on a UK website.
"**** Strauss, **** that malevolent goblin Flower, **** the ECB, **** the cricket media, **** that pious prick Agnew, **** all of them. I’m done."
If he says anything to the effect that the England side is not going to be picked on merit this summer then he can't possibly be judged as anything other than a failure and a ****Massive assumptions here. Let's hear what Strauss says todayand let's judge him in the job after more than a day.
Do you agree that the perception of bias can be just as bad as actual bias? Particularly in a sport which relies heavily on public support?Massive assumptions here. Let's hear what Strauss says todayand let's judge him in the job after more than a day.
This should be the right answerMaybe told him no place for NZ series but he needs to perform on a regular basis and if we get an injury he is going to be considered. Unless you drop Ballance, Root or Bell he has no place in the side if we want 5 bowlers.
The perception of anything is as bad as the reality, so yes.Do you agree that the perception of bias can be just as bad as actual bias? Particularly in a sport which relies heavily on public support?
This. It's a wait and see. If it's not true, I reckon the Agnew comments might've been some kind of tactical ploy to provoke a KP response in which ECB would be vindicated in any such decision.I kinda feel like if KP had been told it was a no nay never that he'd have tweeted about it already because that's how he rolls