SuperMurali
School Boy/Girl Captain
Its a judgement call. not everyone will have the same opinion. I can say that Murali is better than Warnie, but some people will still pick the drug cheating fatso ahead of MuraliWhich he is actually not.
Its a judgement call. not everyone will have the same opinion. I can say that Murali is better than Warnie, but some people will still pick the drug cheating fatso ahead of MuraliWhich he is actually not.
FxdIts a judgement call. not everyone will have the same opinion. I can say that Murali is better than Warnie, but some people will still pick the drug cheating fatso who bowled with a legitimate and unquestioned action ahead of Murali who, as much as everyone loved him, chucked the ball
People shouldn't be throwing tantrums about the inclusion of Kallis as one of the great players then. A high average accompanied by a low strike rate is hardly something that's unheard of in any era.The SR for Greenidge's era was 65.99, and the top order average was 29.33.
Since Greenidge's SR was par for his era, averaged an excellent 45.03, and was an allround legend, I rate Greenidge in the top 5 batsman of the 80s. Comfortably.
Do you realize resorting to trolling only hinders your prospects of getting any respect in this forum later on?Its a judgement call. not everyone will have the same opinion. I can say that Murali is better than Warnie, but some people will still pick the drug cheating fatso ahead of Murali
Definitely more common in the 70s and 80s though, when the ODI game was very very different to the 90s and 2000s.People shouldn't be throwing tantrums about the inclusion Kallis as one of the great players then. A high average accompanied by a low strike rate is hardly something that's unheard of in any era.
if Murali chucked the ball then so did 90% of all the other players
OMG Red Hill plz don't tell me you're in the 'Murali is a Chucker' camp.
That is a ridiculous post which belongs on YouTube.Its a judgement call. not everyone will have the same opinion. I can say that Murali is better than Warnie, but some people will still pick the drug cheating fatso ahead of Murali
Good listTop 10
IVAR
Akram
MSD
SRT
Gilchrist
McGrath
Garner
Bevan
Jones
Ponting
11-20
Crowe
Flintoff
Kallis
Pollock
Jayasuriya
Murali
Klusener
Lara
G Chappell
Saqlain
Imo you could make an XI with that first 11. Just have Bevan and Sachin share 5th bowling duty01. Sachin Tendulkar
02. Sanath Jayasuriya
03. Ricky Ponting
04. Viv Richards
05. AB De Villiers
06. MS Dhoni
07. Shaun Pollock
08. Wasim Akram
09. Joel Garner
10. Muttiah Muralitharan
11. Glenn McGrath
You have a right to be aggrieved.So opinions are only valid if you agree with them?
I will. Any last minute voters/forum newcomers wanna vote before I do?Dammit Red Hill I voted for you in BOTM make this happen.
This a travesty that Dean Jones only got 90 points. As mentioned I could make a case that he was more valuable than Viv because he showed up more often even if Viv was ten times more destructive.I was going to use Red Hill's system but it required too much maths for me. So the points are awarded to each player according to their nominated ranking. That is, 1st place equals 20 points, 2nd place equals 19 points............20th place equals 1 point.
Interestingly the Top 10 or 11 seem reasonably cut n' dried to me with Michael Bevan being the last player to break the 200 point barrier. Richards, Tendulkar, and Wasim are light-years ahead of everyone else. It would be interesting to see whether Red Hill's system changes the order or not.
01. Viv Richards = 473
02. Sachin Tendulkar = 435
03. Wasim Akram = 402
04. Glenn McGrath = 287
05. MS Dhoni = 263
06. Joel Garner = 261
07. Adam Gilchrist = 260
07. Muttiah Muralitharan = 260
09. AB De Villiers = 259
10. Ricky Ponting = 237
11. Michael Bevan = 201
12. Sanath Jayasuriya = 189
13. Shaun Pollock = 175
14. Jacques Kallis = 135
15. Lance Klusener = 125
16. Kapil Dev = 99
17. Dean Jones = 90
18. Waqar Younis = 68
19. Virat Kohli = 65
20. Imran Khan = 57
20. Saqlain Mushtaq = 57
22. Allan Donald = 56
23. Richard Hadlee = 48
24. Brian Lara = 45
24. Kumah Sangakkara = 45
26. Andrew Flintoff = 36
27. Hasim Amla = 33
28. Brett Lee = 30
29. Zaheer Abbas = 27
30. Andrew Symonds = 26
30. Martin Crowe = 26
32. Michael Hussey = 25
33. Mark Waugh = 24
34. Chaminda Vaas = 22
35. Daniel Vettori = 14
36. Surav Ganguly = 13
37. Curtly Ambrose = 12
38. Matthew Hayden = 11
38. Nathan Astle = 11
40. Aravinda De Silva = 10
40. Chris Cairns = 10
42. Shane Bond = 9
42. Nathan Bracken = 9
44. Simon O'Donnell = 8
45. Javed Miandad = 6
45. Inzamam ul-Haq = 6
47. Chris Harris = 5
48. Gordon Greenidge = 4
48. Lasith Malinga = 4
48. Bruce Reid = 4
48. Shane Warne = 4
52. Yuvraj Singh = 3
52. Desmond Haynes = 3
54. Greg Chappell = 2
54. Lance Cairns = 2
56: Richard Reid = 1
56. Rohit Sharma = 1
56. Damien Martyn = 1
56. Mitchell Starc = 1
Note: Sorry Nate, but I left your nominations out because Nathan Braken at No.1, no Viv Richards etc was a bit iffy.
I reckon that if I were to make a favourite XI (balanced) based on the above results then it would probably look like this;
01. Sachin Tendulkar
02. Sanath Jayasuriya
03. Ricky Ponting
04. Viv Richards
05. AB De Villiers
06. MS Dhoni
07. Shaun Pollock
08. Wasim Akram
09. Joel Garner
10. Muttiah Muralitharan
11. Glenn McGrath
The earlier pioneers of ODI cricket are in danger of being forgotten by the modern power players with the bat technology shorter boundaries etc etc all helping them.This a travesty that Dean Jones only got 90 points. As mentioned I could make a case that he was more valuable than Viv because he showed up more often even if Viv was ten times more destructive.