Let me think about this in more detail
30 - (Bryan V Orton V Batista) yeah, this year was better, as it was unpredictable and a great 1 on 1 will usually be better than a great triple threat (obviously this ended a triple threat but). The 30 main is stellar but wasn't even MOTN (that being Bryan V HHH IMO) for me
29 - (Rock V Cena) this year without a second thought
28 - (Rock V Cena) 28 has that Hogan-Andre epic feel and it is a real good match but preferred this one
27 - (Miz V Cena) this year without a second thought
26 - (Taker V Shawn) This is the first one I've doubted myself on
25 - (HHH V Orton) If Brock had covered Reigns after the first F5 and won there and then, this year's would still be better
24 - (Edge V Taker) close, but this year is better
23 - (Cena V Shawn) oooooh I love this match but this year was better
22 - (Cena V HHH) not close. This year was better
21 - (HHH V Batista) see above
20 - (HHH V Benoit V HBK) - yeah this belongs in the argument. But Reigns, Brock and Rollins have never killed any kids
19 - (Brock V Angle) - this year was better because Brock didn't nearly end his career
18 - (Jericho V HHH) - not close
17 - (Austin V Rock) - this was my starting point and no this year's main did not better this.
So I'm only allowing 20 and 26 into the argument. 20 is disqualified because Benoit kills kids. 26 is disqualified because it's a great match but they had a better one at 25 when it wasn't the main (I'm just making my rules up as I go along)
I therefore stand by my statement