Brett Lee was a good death option when you were behind in the game and needed something special; he often dragged Australia back into it. He could really go the journey at the death too -- more moreso than other bowlers of his calibre -- so I wouldn't put him up there with the best who you could bank on to ram home a strong position too. Lee was the death bowling equivalent of going all in.Brett Lee
Ishant and Dinda manage to finish games far sooner than they should
Sometimes. Definitely our best death bowler, but he isn't anywhere near the Malinga territory. Southee bowls a pretty good bouncer, has a nice slower variation and you can rely on that game in game out. His yorker and lines at the death can sometimes go missing though. Which typically means he will bowl 3-4 good balls, and 2-3 balls that are decent if we're lucky and outright pies if we're not.Tim Southee is pretty good at this skill I suppose.
I always felt that Lee was as least as reliable as McGrath as a death bowler.Brett Lee was a good death option when you were behind in the game and needed something special; he often dragged Australia back into it. He could really go the journey at the death too -- more moreso than other bowlers of his calibre -- so I wouldn't put him up there with the best who you could bank on to ram home a strong position too. Lee was the death bowling equivalent of going all in.
very goodLee was the death bowling equivalent of going all in.
Umar Gul was so effective in the 2007 T20 WC, the difference there was that he was assigned a set role which suited him. He didn't bowl with the new ball in the tournament, delivered amazing yorkers, slower ones and bouncers at the death.Wasn't Umar Gul awesome for around 12-24 months? Around the time Pakistan won the T20 WC in 2009?