• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* English Football Season 2014-15

Jarquis

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
sledger said:
I'd actually be surprised if Arsenal lose tonight, but I can't see them winning by 3 goals to make up the aggregate score.

Still, it ought to be a fun watch. Unless Arsenal concede in the first 10 mins or something.

Which I suppose they probably will now that I've said that.
Click to expand...
Which wouldn't have actually changed much in the context of the tie - we'd have still needed three.
Furball said:
No, nor was it a penalty.
Click to expand...
Nah mate, haven't you watched any of this season? It's got to be one or the other.
 
Cabinet96

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
sledger said:
It's not necessarily too attacking imo, but certainly more attacking than I expected, and probably more attacking than is wise. Welbeck and Cazorla contribute a reasonable amount defensively, so I can see the logic here. Would have been worse if Walcott had started over Welbeck, for instance.
Click to expand...
It's not much but I'd have played Ramsey instead of Welbeck. The first 15 minutes was my worry where we couldn't really get it out of the deep areas into the attack and it's because we've basically got more strikers than midfielders at the moment. It got better as the half went on though. It also means Walcott is the only forward who can come off from the bench, though Ramsey will come on for Cazorla or Coquelin at some point.
 
Furball

Furball

Evil Scotsman
That a player as intelligent as Scholes was doesn't see what Özil brings to the side is infuriating.

Oh cool, let's lay into him for swapping shirts.
 
Jarquis

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
sledger said:
Scoring 3 =/= winning by 3 iirc.
Click to expand...
And I'm saying I don't see why us conceding early would've altered much at all. We don't actually need to win by 3. Obviously 3-0 means we go through in normal time but 3-1 still gives us a great chance and so wouldn't have had much of an effect on the game plan.
 
Scaly piscine

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
England-esque defending there ironically, converting a 2 on 4 + keeper into a 1 on 1 with the keeper, but for an erroneous flag.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top