Well, some might feel that the blacks in the Zimbabwe team are there on merit.99% of the time that preface comes before something racist. I genuinely have no idea why you used it on this particular occasion.
uhhh why don't you just talk about who should be in the team and who shouldn't be?Well, some might feel that the blacks in the Zimbabwe team are there on merit.
Can you go into details on why you believe this given that you firmly believe it?But I firmly believe Zimbabwe would have had a much better chance at the WC if their players were picked on ability instead of race.
Yeah an argument could certainly be made for how this has sculpted Zimbabwe cricket overall, but from the current crop of players no one has been unjustly left out.There are many institutional problems within the setup of ZC. Some of them, like it or not, are race-related.
However, and I say this as a keen follower of Zimbabwean domestic cricket and as someone deeply opposed to 'affirmative action' and quotas, there was nothing racist about the squad selection for the World Cup or the team selection yesterday.
If you're going to make a claim like that then you have to be much more specific about which players you think should've been selected instead.
Are you suggesting none of them are there on merit? Seems like a sweeping generalisation to me. Which is appropriate for this thread, I suppose.Well, some might feel that the blacks in the Zimbabwe team are there on merit.
Well you've just created a bit of a strawman here, haven't you? You're asking me to pick the white players who would have been chosen over the black players but the reality is all the good white crickets are being persecuted and don't get to play FC cricket. Furthermore most of the talented white cricketers have left the country.If you're going to make a claim like that then you have to be much more specific about which players you think should've been selected instead.
You're not making any sense ...ah yes that devious strawman known as "exactly the question asked in the one-sentence op"
No; you've shifted the goalposts. You were specifically referring to selection in this thread; not structural problems that I agree exist.Well you've just created a bit of a strawman here, haven't you?
If you're going to make a claim that their selection was wrong/biased, which -- regardless of whether you go on to deny it by shifting the goalposts again after this post -- is exactly what you did in the opening post, you should have examples of their poor selection.if their players were picked on ability instead of race
I should've been picked ahead of Kamungozi obviously.PEWS is actually a Zimbabwean ftr.
/conspiracy
/butseriouslyheis