Oh yeah without doubt. Can already see us needing to chase something like 175 to make the quarter-finals and making an almighty mess of it.us v Afghanistan next month will be close.
Hmmm yeah. If the on field was out and the decision was upheld then it woudl've been the right one. Here I dunno.Yeah but I don't think on the basis of how the technology has been used that should have been given out. Snicko showed nothing outside normal deviation. Visual replay showed a possible change of change direction but it was a feather if it did.
I think Pakistani fans would feel right to be aggrieved with that one.
Yes, but I understand why I could be unhappy if I was a Pakistani supporter.Excellent decision.
Was "umpires call" all over.Hmmm yeah. If the on field was out and the decision was upheld then it woudl've been the right one. Here I dunno.
Na should've said not out and let Indian fans call for hotspot to be in the next world cup.in an ideal world, I say that's how DRS should work. Let the TV umpire make up his own mind regardless of what the on field decision was.
Would still be annoyed as a Pakistani fan but who cares.
Reckon we bowled/fielded very well for the first 12-13 or so and got the RRR high despite not taking many wickets.Okay so they now need 8 an over. Turn that screw.
No, you're looking for the spikes in the noise to distinguish it from the background noise. There were no spikes.There was noise in snicko, even if small. His bat wasn't close to the pad so it wasn't that. What else could it be?
His feet grinding forward? Snicko definitely picks foot movement up at that sort of degree. Or the keepers feet.There was noise in snicko, even if small. His bat wasn't close to the pad so it wasn't that. What else could it be?
Visually, I thought there was a deviation. The question is how much evidence is enough. It's just way too subjective.There was noise in snicko, even if small. His bat wasn't close to the pad so it wasn't that. What else could it be?