MMarsh?So seriously who do Australia leave out for Clarke if Bailey goes good here?
Yes but his first chance average still sucksHard to say as I'm not watching 9's.
Great work Finch. I'm tasting but don't care.
Reckon that's much worse for balance than Watson would be.MMarsh?
same as always. your choice of opener, with watson opening.So seriously who do Australia leave out for Clarke if Bailey goes good here? Watson being dropped would mean Maxwell/Clarke/Smith has to bowl 10 overs. People confident in that?
So Warner or the bloke who's 135*? Pre tri series I'd have not played Warner, but he looks the goods now.same as always. your choice of opener, with watson opening.
Bailey.So seriously who do Australia leave out for Clarke if Bailey goes good here?
I think Finn was done by the bounce off the edge of the square. Not an excuse though... however we have finally managed a shock burst of competent fielding!LolEngland this is getting absurd
I disagree. Marsh hardly bowls all that much more than Watto does. And bats far lower down the order. He's the obvious one to go imo.Reckon that's much worse for balance than Watson would be.
You could drop Watson but I mean Marsh and Maxwell are the fourth bowlers...Obviously they're hoping Clarkeh can bowl but..So Warner or the bloke who's 135*? Pre tri series I'd have not played Warner, but he looks the goods now.
Tbh, Marsh is just filling in for Faulkner, who definitely would bowl more than Watto. I'm kind of thinking for the business end of the tournament here and assuming Faulkner is fit.I disagree. Marsh hardly bowls all that much more than Watto does. And bats far lower down the order. He's the obvious one to go imo.