Was properly out of sorts in 2014, looked shot against South Africa. Now he just looks a little out of sorts.Interesting to look at NZ batting SRs in the last 12 months (qual 200+ runs)
Didn't realize Guppy has been quite this horrible.
View attachment 21758
He's faced nearly twice the number of balls as mccullum for a 10 run lower average and barely more than half the strike rate. Getting to be a serious issue.Interesting to look at NZ batting SRs in the last 12 months (qual 200+ runs)
Didn't realize Guppy has been quite this horrible.
View attachment 21758
I think 300 is par, 320 we're ahead. 270 and they are.What do you think is a par-score on this. I probably wouldn't feel comfortable with anything less than 320.
We're not going to win a World Cup scoring 250, which if Gup is in for the amount of time he is today, is about our high water mark unless someone else goes nuts. Even the singles he does get, they're seemingly balls that happened to travel outside the circle or in a gap rather than pinpoint placement.Don't think his SR today is that much of an issue. We're still going at 5 an over. If he had scored 3 or 4 boundaries in that 19 then it would be. But he is rotating the strike albeit somewhat ineffectively. Guptill is a liability when he scores 80% of his runs in boundaries and doesn't go over a strike rate of 80.
Didn't realise Sri Lanka had played twice as many games as any other team.Reasonable case to be made for Williamson being the best no. 3 in the world in the last 12 months....
View attachment 21759
Na rubbish. Non-existent pressure. When the two blokes at the other end are striking at 100 without playing a risky shot you don't need to play a risky shot just to artificially raise your own strike rate so you look good.Useful boundaries. You have to wonder whether he has a very inflated sense of self importance though. There's no way you should get as far as 19 (43). That's just straight up not caring about the pressure you're putting on your team.
We're not going to score 250 at 50/3 either.We're not going to win a World Cup scoring 250, which if Gup is in for the amount of time he is today, is about our high water mark unless someone else goes nuts. Even the singles he does get, they're seemingly balls that happened to travel outside the circle or in a gap rather than pinpoint placement.
It must be frustrating as all hell to bat around. A strike rate of 65 over the last 12 months is absolutely horrid, especially when coupled with his average. Speaks volumes for our depth, and the amount of in the bank credit we're prepared to give him, that he's still in the side.
This is a slightly odd comment. We have a RR of 5.3 after 17 overs, which strikes me as an excellent platform to push on to 300+ (as we repeatedly did against India last year when Guptill was nurdling it at an SR of 60-odd).We're not going to win a World Cup scoring 250, which if Gup is in for the amount of time he is today, is about our high water mark unless someone else goes nuts. Even the singles he does get, they're seemingly balls that happened to travel outside the circle or in a gap rather than pinpoint placement.
It must be frustrating as all hell to bat around. A strike rate of 65 over the last 12 months is absolutely horrid, especially when coupled with his average. Speaks volumes for our depth, and the amount of in the bank credit we're prepared to give him, that he's still in the side.
Haha finally an argument I have nothing to say against.Bowling plans to him are so obvious too. Just bowl any spinner or any bowler who can hit back of a length.