Apart from that Techtron rating nonsense. What the hell does it achieve? Truly bemusing and pretty ****ty marketing. Tui laughing at the ineffectiveness of it allWASP is the most pointless gimmick ever.
Wasp changing its mind quicker than my mrs
Apart from that Techtron rating nonsense. What the hell does it achieve? Truly bemusing and pretty ****ty marketing. Tui laughing at the ineffectiveness of it allWASP is the most pointless gimmick ever.
History suggests not.. he underbowls himself consistently..Meaningless warm ups?
Sri Lanka would prefer their specialist seamers actually do their job than prove Mathews is better than them.
I think zinzan was more questioning the idea that it actually does accurately represent who's winning; not that people could understand its intentions. A couple of overs ago Sri Lanka were paying over 4s on betfair but favourites according to WASP; NZ were clearly winning at that point.Well my dad gets it and he is definitely a casual.
LOL yeah, forgot about Techron. WTF is that even supposed to mean?Apart from that Techtron rating nonsense. What the hell does it achieve? Truly bemusing and pretty ****ty marketing. Tui laughing at the ineffectiveness of it all
Wasp changing its mind quicker than my mrs
Because his captain is from his high school and he has more faith in his **** teammate than himself.Brilliant from Ronchi. 24 of the Over and game is Over.
Why does perera bowl so much? I have always seen him getting hammered.
I don't mean understanding the methodology, I mean the accuracy/relevance of it's prediction.Well my dad gets it and he is definitely a casual.
They're WAGs, who gives a ****. Anything to make them shut up and get you another beer.I don't mean understanding the methodology, I mean the accuracy/relevance of it's prediction.
Haha that's the point of my post - I have no idea. I haven't watched as much home summer cricket as I'd like to have, and I've seen this nonsense pop up now and then. I genuinely wished to know whether there was some science/stats-based idea to it, or if it's just a random rubbish marketing ploy. Coz if it's the latter, that's pretty laughable in a 21st century sense.LOL yeah, forgot about Techron. WTF is that even supposed to mean?
The Techron thing is just a sneaky deceptive way of making WASP seem comparatively useful.Arnold finally explained what the Techron thing meant in the 1st ODI. Stupidest thing ever.
5 star rating for bowlers based on economy, 5 star rating for bowlers based on balls per boundary
Neither take into account the match situation at all. Worst thing ever.
Yeah, it'll be him or Jeevan to miss out if Malinga is fit. If he's not slapping dingers at the end of the innings once every few games (and lately his batting has been truly **** to go with his always-**** bowling) then he could find himself out for Lakmal, Prasad or even Chandimal even if Malinga isn't fit.Is Perera's spot in doubt? I don't see what he adds, tbh.
Haha. That is ludicrous. Either Caltex paid peanuts to get marketing monkeys or someone really isn't up to their job. Either way, I'll go to Shell - Shell Cup/Trophy were the days.Arnold finally explained what the Techron thing meant in the 1st ODI. Stupidest thing ever.
5 star rating for bowlers based on economy, 5 star rating for batsman based on balls per boundary
Neither take into account the match situation at all. Worst thing ever.
It would be salvageable if the star rating's were based on a statistically meaningfully stats, ie SD for economy rates and boundaries per ball over the last 5 years. Instead we are given arbitrary values with no thought behind them. Seems ridiculously easy for bowlers to get 5 stars, especially when its trotted out 5 overs into the game.Arnold finally explained what the Techron thing meant in the 1st ODI. Stupidest thing ever.
5 star rating for bowlers based on economy, 5 star rating for batsman based on balls per boundary
Neither take into account the match situation at all. Worst thing ever.