Sena's from my high school and I like him so nyarhhhhhh.So have I and I disagree so nyarhhhhh
uh, they do?I've pretty much watched every single SL game in the last 2-3 years, and Sena is definitely the better big hitter, the numbers back it up as well.
95+ SR vs ~80. With 2 overs left I would always pick the former.uh, they do?
Will never forget Kula's 70 odd at Brisbane or his 'nightwatchman' knock in the CT against England, good times
Pretty good score this but christ our middle to lower order flopped hard
probably something to do with the fact that Kula has always come in earlier than Sena.95+ SR vs ~80. With 2 overs left I would always pick the former.
SR doesn't necessarily correlate with how far you can hit the ball though95+ SR vs ~80. With 2 overs left I would always pick the former.
Well I didn't use "big hitter" literally - more like the ability to score runs quickly. Even if I did, Sena can make merry too.SR doesn't necessarily correlate with how far you can hit the ball though
Why so gloomy? I guess time will tell, but 276 against a strong batting lineup on a pitch were the Chump Districts made 326/3 isn't a bad effort. Particularly encouraging this season has been our ability to take regular wickets and close down the scoring rate in the final 15 overs.I think it's time to admit we're not as good a bowling team as we think we are.
A team with a decent lower order would've made 350 from where they were.Why so gloomy? I guess time will tell, but 276 against a strong batting lineup on a pitch were the Chump Districts made 326/3 isn't a bad effort. Particularly encouraging this season has been our ability to take regular wickets and close down the scoring rate in the final 15 overs.
Indeed, however we haven't seen the best of him with the bat since that Ireland ODI really, been missing his finishingKula's strike rate is 94 since the start of 2012 anyway.
Setting aside the contestable notion that 350 from 165/2 after 30 would've been easy for any team with a strong lower-order, it's worth acknowledging very few teams have as strong a top-order as SRL have. Only South Africa and India can rival them in terms of top 5 run-making potential, both of whom also have shakey lower-orders (and we've already show-cased our ability to manage India's batting in home conditions with more or less the same side in the past 12 months). All in all, I continue to be very encouraged by the bowling's efforts. Milne's injury is a blow, he seemed keen to keep on fielding so fingers crossed that it's not that serious and Brendon is just taking precautions. But the real problem remains the batting, so it will be interesting to see how things look now that Kane is back in the side with a challenging total to chase.A team with a decent lower order would've made 350 from where they were.
Mitch was rubbish early on. He somehow seems to collect decent figures with some canny/jammy death bowling but he's a liability as opener or first change bowler at the moment.
Milne was excellent today but he's probably out of the tournament.
Boult is still a big question mark and I still think we don't know what our best lineup is.
And Sanga doesn't allow McCullum to bash him by coming up to the stumps.Good move opening with Mathews, especially in the context of this lineup.