All depends on overhead conditions. The wicket itself is batsman friendly for the rest of the match - it'll get lower and slower which suits Sri Lanka.I feel like 275 is honours even. I think anything over that is advantage NZ.
Nope. The longer until Herath is introduced into the attack, the better for NZ.Anyone else get the feeling that Herath would be easier to face at the moment for Williamson than the pacers?
Maybe they think he will use this innings to push his case to be in the WC squad.With the ring field. Trying to bore-out a batsman with a career strike rate barely above 40. Interesting.
Agree. And IIRC Herath is exceedingly good against lower order/tail-end batsmen.Nope. The longer until Herath is introduced into the attack, the better for NZ.
IMO.
OR depends on Sanga-Mathews.All depends on overhead conditions. The wicket itself is batsman friendly for the rest of the match - it'll get lower and slower which suits Sri Lanka.
FixedAgree. And IIRC Herath is exceedingly good against OUR lower order/tail-end batsmen.
Guess we'll find out - but an easy two from the first ball is a good start.Nope. The longer until Herath is introduced into the attack, the better for NZ.
IMO.
Haha, not just ours. Look at his record.Fixed
actually think it was Prasad appealing for something that hit the bat, no one else was that stupid...Sri Lanka appealing for something hitting the middle of the bat.
I don't think it's the quality of the ball. Two years ago New Zealand pioneered a new secret method to whinging about the ball that was successful and now other teams are clicking.Surely with the amount of failures of the ball, ICC would deem that the Kookaburra is no longer suitable for test cricket until they prove more durable like the Duke. This is just ridiculous.
agree, i actually think anything over 260 will be tough for us tbhOn the target, what gives me hope is chases around and over 200-250 are never easy. I can't remember the last time a side cruised to victory in New Zealand chasing something that wasn't terrible.
300 will be very hard at the Basin.
Right, but when you're seeing as many as five ball changes per innings - considering the majority of balls are ones that are deemed "fit for use" after being used for a number of overs already, either "Sorry lads, that's your ball" or "Sorry Kookaburra, not good enough" needs to happen.I don't think it's the quality of the ball. Two years ago New Zealand pioneered a new secret method to whinging about the ball that was successful and now other teams are clicking.
This is true, think we have to go back a decade when both South Africa and Pakistan successfully chased 230odd & 270odd respectively in NZ conditions. Both comfortable 6-7 wickets wins if my memory serves.On the target, what gives me hope is chases around and over 200-250 are never easy. I can't remember the last time a side cruised to victory in New Zealand chasing something that wasn't terrible.
300 will be very hard at the Basin.
Yeah my edit was a bit late. I added that I wouldn't be surprised if NZ are putting the ball out of shape somehow on purpose when they've decided they don't like it. Look at the timing of when it gets changed.Right, but when you're seeing as many as five ball changes per innings - considering the majority of balls are ones that are deemed "fit for use" after being used for a number of overs already, either "Sorry lads, that's your ball" or "Sorry Kookaburra, not good enough" needs to happen.