I think it's just to better balance the icing and the cake now that Guptill has become more of an anchor. I don't mind it really.Anyone have any idea as to the reasoning behind playing Latham in the middle? The only reasons I can think of is he is there to stabilise things if it goes to custard or he was just playing the ODI's to make up the numbers.
Yep, my thoughts exactly. Henry has made Mills expendable, he provides everything Mills does and more. If you want his experience hire him as a coach.The more I think about it, the more Mills may have to be the one to miss out. Henry can do what Mills does at the top and in the middle. And with Mills not being there, all of our quicks will be natural athletes and our only dodgy fielder will be Vettori.
They could drop Neesham for another quickGuptill
McCullum
Williamson
Taylor
Latham
Anderson
Ronchi
Vettori
Southee
Henry
Milne
NcCullum
McClenaghan
Boult
Neesham
That would mean having absoutely no back-up batsman in the entire squad, which would be ridiculous.They could drop Neesham for another quick
It wasn't my thought and it wouldn't be something I would come up with. Someone mentioned it to me who should have some knowledge. Apparently Jimmy's stocks area a bit low in some people's eyes.That would mean having absoutely no back-up batsman in the entire squad, which would be ridiculous.
You forgot Boult - apparently he's pretty much in the squadOpeners: Guptill, Brownlie, Devcich
Middle Order: Williamson, Taylor, Latham, McCullum, Anderson, Neesham
Keeper: Ronchi
Spinners: Vettori, NcCullum
Pace Bowlers: Mills, Southee, Henry, McClenaghan, Milne
There are 17 names mentioned above. Leaving out two players would be a big head-ache for the management.