Am glad Dhawan stood up for his mate. Had it been an Indian batsman who reacted like Warner today then 2-3 Aussie fielders would've done the same thing that Dhawan did.I don't think either Aaron or Warner was "in the wrong". Aaron made a breakthrough and was simply enjoying the wicket, didn't really send off Warner as much as try to pump up his team. Warner being a dick with the riposte was simply taking advantage of a rare occasion for a batsman to rile up the bowler. Arguably one can say that it was Dhawan who took things too seriously and to the next level.
I don't think one should lose too much sleep over it, it was kind of funny tbh.
You're a horrible human being.The most important question which isn't being asked at all is whether to call it What-gate or Come-on-gate... we need a poll.
Now, what caused that reaction?You're a horrible human being.
Agreed. It's Australia v India - about as warm and fuzzy as a corporate takeover. Let's not get too precious.I don't think one should lose too much sleep over it, it was kind of funny tbh.
It was a joke breh, you'll get there eventually *pat*Now, what caused that reaction?
Don't worry I don't leave the house.Don't try that joke in a party.
Well I guess there goes that first match..1-0 Aussies..Here is a small fun fact:
The last time India batted 98 overs in the 4th innings outside subcontinent to save a test was in 1979 in this match!
4th Test: England v India at The Oval, Aug 30-Sep 4, 1979 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
We'll just call you gate.We shall call this incident joke-gate.
This was a much better attempt at a joke.Don't worry I don't leave the house.
Don't underestimate Saha.The long tail is what should really give us the big advantage