• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in Sri Lanka 2014

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
More importantly, SL shouldn't have lost their review in this case.
I agree in principle, but that'd just be making the rules up as they went along. It's something they could look to tinker the rules on, but as it stands they couldn't have just decided to not take the review off them.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
So yeah, just to emphasise how silly this lineup is, 8 of our lineup have batted as high as six in test matches (excluding night watchmen duties) plus we have Hales who hasn't played a test.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
So yeah, just to emphasise how silly this lineup is, 8 of our lineup have batted as high as six in test matches (excluding night watchmen duties) plus we have Hales who hasn't played a test.
Minus Broad and Anderson do we actually have bowlers to pick though
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Morgan to totally escape any criticism, as is the way of things. In fact no doubt more calls for his being captain.
 

Top