boycs, slats, greigy, nicholas.Was Boycs on channel 4? Ultimate troll.
Sky do a great job with the Tests; their domestic ODI games just seem like the guys are there to get the cheque at the end of the day at times. That's what's good about having some different voices do one part of the season, and a T20 competition is perfect for it.I just think it'd get shoved on ITV4 or whatever and get even fewer viewers than on Sky Sports. Dunno.
It's a tough one because on the one hand you do want kids exposed to cricket on FTA - but on the other hand Sky have done an incredible job with it.
Up to 100K on most of the domestic ODers is pretty good too.Say what you will about CA, but getting 1,000,000 plus eyeballs on the Big Bash, on Free-To-Air, is massive in terms of engagement. Think this may be the chance to repackage your T20 competition.
Commentators were in the main fantastic; the ex-cricketers were super, issue were the other Ch 10 guys. All the same gadgets, maybe not hot spot?I wasn't in Australia for the Big Bash last yer; how were the Channel 10 commentators? Did they have all the gadgets the C9 guys have/anything new?
I sort of agree but I also understand the fta channels. The time has gone for such channels to invest heavily in a sport only to watch the rain come down. They would basically pay to disrupt all their other programmes. Cricket will obviously continue for a long time yet. It gets the second highest ratings on sky but it seems to be in steady long term decline in England especially relative to other sports. Test crowds are slipping now as well. Looking at the kind of relationship Wimbledon tennis and 6-nations rugby have with the BBC really shows crickets problems.There should be no giving the game to anyone. If they want it then they can pay for it. Im all for cricket being on FTA but they have to make an effort as well. The main network broadcasters are not willing to really be competitive despite making certain noises. The BBC being the worst having completely abandoned the game. **** terrestrial TV if they are not willing and they are not.
If you look at how US broadcasters have evolved then live broadcasts are King for exactly the reasons you described. Everything can now be Sky Plused, torrented or watched online. Sports events have to be watched live or they lose value and broadcasters need those eyes on their advertisements. This isnt relevant to BBC but in the UK other broadcasters are slow to pick up on this.Over here, FTA channels are investing quite a bit in sport, because it's something that has to be watched live, which means you can't Sky Plus it and skip the ads or watch it on a streaming service. Fair to say the same thing isn't happening in England?