Athlai
Not Terrible
Would be 10/10 if one of those links was "How to take a screensho..."Oh it's been sah long
Would be 10/10 if one of those links was "How to take a screensho..."Oh it's been sah long
Sorry, but taking the last four wickets to fall in a contrived result match doesn't count as Sodhi bowling his team to a victory. Everyone who bowled took wickets and Sodhi, as per usual, was given the confidence boost at the end of the innings - the real damage was the first innings declaration, i.e where Sodhi went for 39 from 8 overs - into a second innings where Canterbury fell apart and didn't even manage forty overs faced.
Oh, and please don't act like you remember the game. You obvs just looked it up.See, you're wrong again. Sodhi has bowled ND to victory before. I'm sure you'll make up some sort of bull**** as to why it doesn't count but he most definitely has.
You hate, because you're insecure and a tall poppy player. The idea that somehow you're all unified in response is really down to the fact that you're all passive aggressive people who can't help being told you're wrong in almost every statement you make.
Must've slayed quite a few biches too I guess. Probably own 10 cars and live in a mansion to I take it?Wrong. I have more first class wickets than Craig does. I also have played for more professional teams than Williamson has.
Plain old haterade, bro.Must've slayed quite a few biches too I guess. Probably own 10 cars and live in a mansion to I take it?
Sure I did, doesn't change the fact that those wickets are pretty much exactly what I've been stating previously - Sodhi takes the bulk of his wickets after the sixth wicket falls.Oh, and please don't act like you remember the game. You obvs just looked it up.
You also stated that Sodhi had never bowled ND to victory before, and you were wrong there so.....Sure I did, doesn't change the fact that those wickets are pretty much exactly what I've been stating previously - Sodhi takes the bulk of his wickets after the sixth wicket falls.
OK, you take a contrived result where Sodhi took his first wicket at 6 for 59 as "Sodhi bowled the side to victory" and I'll say "Uhm, no, it's not" - and we'll disagree, then you'll hate on the fact that I know more than you do and start the same old "Oh, you must live in a MarsOne podule getting ready for a space launch" bollocks you do whenever you run out of cricketing arguments and have to go back to personal.You also stated that Sodhi had never bowled ND to victory before, and you were wrong there so.....
Dont worry. Taking NZ FC wickets is like winning at checkers while everyone else is playing chess.Must've slayed quite a few biches too I guess. Probably own 10 cars and live in a mansion to I take it?
Of course you'll say it doesn't count, I said an hour before you replied that you would make up a reason for it not to count. Every single batsman he dismissed has a first class 100, but don't mention that at all. Don't mention that he bowled right through unchanged from the 12th over. Don't mention that the three other bowlers had a combined four wickets between them. Don't mention that because of rain the pitch was practically still a day two pitch. No, the only reason Sodhi took those wickets was because the game was pushed forward and the rest of the bowling attack did the hard yards.OK, you take a contrived result where Sodhi took his first wicket at 6 for 59 as "Sodhi bowled the side to victory" and I'll say "Uhm, no, it's not" - and we'll disagree, then you'll hate on the fact that I know more than you do and start the same old "Oh, you must live in a MarsOne podule getting ready for a space launch" bollocks you do whenever you run out of cricketing arguments and have to go back to personal.
Typical Howsie amateur hour debating attempts - "Even though I know you'll refute my opinion with a pretty reasonable statement, I'm going to say upfront that you'll refute my opinion so I can call back to it and say Well ain't that a bunch of bull****. "Of course you'll say it doesn't count, I said an hour before you replied that you would make up a reason for it not to count. Every single batsman he dismissed has a first class 100, but don't mention that at all. Don't mention that he bowled right through unchanged from the 12th over. Don't mention that the three other bowlers had a combined four wickets between them. Don't mention that because of rain the pitch was practically still a day two pitch. No, the only reason Sodhi took those wickets was because the game was pushed forward and the rest of the bowling attack did the hard yards.
Typcial Blocky bull****. Excuses, excuses, excuses. Just like the one you have lined up for Neil Wagner after this series.
Let's see.I still can't find any post that says Ish is NZ's best spinner tho.
Everyone says he is young and has the most potential, and due to the best NZ spinner being **** you might as well pick Sodhi.
Everyone who has watched the game also agrees that Sodhi looked like NZ's best bowler.
Blocky hasn't argued against any of these points and has made like 40 rage filled posts hating on Sodhi and tossing the word 'passive-aggressive' around a lot (which is ironic given his new found love for WW). Plus the unsubstanciated claim that he is a former FC cricketer.
On top of that, Blocky still hasn't explained why he posts on this forum if we are all passive-aggressive dumb ****s with wrong opinions.
ITSTL.
Reported.Atleast WW is a troll I can see how he derives his joy from this forum...but not so sure about Blocky. If we all are so dumb, ignorant and wrong...then why doesn't he leave?
Don't worry - realistically they just don't understand some of us can debate cricket, have differing opinions and not get personally offended when we're called on those opinions being wrong. The moderators aren't likely to do anything about it because you've got a group of them who bunch up and perpetuate discussions, then play the "woe is me" passive aggressive game they always do when you call them on it. At this point they're actually trolling you to get you to respond/report.Reported.