straw man
Hall of Fame Member
...for being too good. Lovely drift in that ball to get AmlaHopefully Mills is reported after this game
...for being too good. Lovely drift in that ball to get AmlaHopefully Mills is reported after this game
I'd say we're 1 wicket away in the 2-3 overs from being fairly even. McLaren and Philander can bat but in a pressure situation that tail is a lot longer than ours.Surprised to see the odds so strongly in SA's favour at this point. Might just be my bias, but I feel like it's a lot closer than that. Another wicket brings us right into it.
IMO it's a good thing that we remove the idea of playing 3 economy type bowlers. It's not going to work against good teams. Nathan McCullum, Daniel Vettori and to a lesser extent Kyle Mills have not been good enough.Unfortunately yeah, we're drifting off the pace now. Barring a miracle double strike in the very near future I think this game is gone.
From a casual look at cricinfo, it seemed like Vettori bowled bloody well until he got hit a bit in his last two overs - which isn't hugely surprising given the batsmen were set and the pitch was true. McCullum seemed to be pretty average though.IMO it's a good thing that we remove the idea of playing 3 economy type bowlers. It's not going to work against good teams. Nathan McCullum, Daniel Vettori and to a lesser extent Kyle Mills have not been good enough.
Similarly, if Guptill is going to continue to have no scoring options against good bowlers and if Brownlie continues to struggle against spin it's good for that to be proven comprehensively before the world cup. Obviously the other batsmen failed too but at least Neesham, Latham and McCullum looked like they could cope.
Without Ronchi would've been embarrassing for kiwis, you can never go wrong with an Aussie
He's a good batsman too by NZ standards, he'll do well in the future, if you're ever in doubt always pick an AussieThen why didn't Dean Brownlie ton up?