flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I guess he is a bit fat.Big wicket that.
I guess he is a bit fat.Big wicket that.
Did you tolerate getting BTFO by Swann and Monty on your home turf?Can we stop getting out to Moeen Ali ffs?*
* I know some of you rate Ali, but we are Indian fans. We don't tolerate losing wickets to ANY spinner. OK, I probably tolerated Muralitharan. And Saqlain. But that's it.
Of course not. I cried for many nights.Did you tolerate getting BTFO by Swann and Monty on your home turf?
From the article:Found this quite interesting actually: Numbers Game: England's problems against spin | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
So England only score against spin at a rate of 0.11 and 0.1 per over worse than India and Australia respectively, while scoring at a rate of 0.11 and 0.21 better than SA and SL each. The issue is we get out to them a lot more, hence our average being third worse amongst the top 10.
Go **** yourself, Rajesh. A useless piece of **** article from a useless piece of ****. I hope you die of gonorrhea. Slowly.New Zealand, surprisingly, are on top of the table with a 50-plus average and a run rate of more than five
India were still in it until Dhoni got out, after that its been a bit of a bore though, just gone nowhere after that.Crap ODI series. Not one competitive game, India on the plane home already in this one and far, far to good in the others.
Would have been more realistic for your exaggeration for effect, if you hadn't been saying the exact same thing all through the series.Of course not. I cried for many nights.
PS. Don't act so touchy. What I said is called exaggeration for effect. Geez
India were miles off the pace even with Dhoni there, it was on only because he could score 130* because he is a G.O.A.T not because it actually was happening.India were still in it until Dhoni got out, after that its been a bit of a bore though, just gone nowhere after that.