Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
............yes I think this could happen.
BBC Sport - Indian Premier League 'shouldn't be there', says Sir Ian Botham
BBC Sport - Indian Premier League 'shouldn't be there', says Sir Ian Botham
Yeah, but it can't be an IPL thing only. It must happen in all the leagues which exist in poor(er) countries - Pakistan, Bangladesh, SL, Windies (?), Zimbabwe (do they have one?).Makes a pretty valid point about the corruption aspect.
Great hope this comes to pass.............yes I think this could happen. View attachment 21436
BBC Sport - Indian Premier League 'shouldn't be there', says Sir Ian Botham
good post.Who's gained the most from the IPL? We're not talking of boards or franchises, but countries' cricketing scenes. I feel it is Australia. The IPL virtually created David Warner's international career and he's now a leading Test opener. The flagging career of Shane Watson got new life in the IPL and so did Dirk Nannes', albeit to a limited extent in T20Is. Then Dave Hussey as a limited overs player, and also Cameron White. Plenty of fringe Aussie players have come up quickly this way.
It's also helped South Africa find and rediscover a few of their players. Some Lankans and West Indians have had a great time too, although none have used the IPL as a supply line or priming booth quite like Australia and South Africa. If the IPL ceased to exist, we'd know who'd get hit the most.
As an India supporter, I'm on the fence. IPL has brought home higher standards of cricket missing in the Indian domestic scene, but the way franchises operate, most young Indian players and domestic performers miss out on a lot, so not much of a positive here.
Couldn't disagree more about this. It's about the only cricket on FTA in the UK so I've watched a fair bit of it in spite of the standard being pretty ****ing dreadful the majority of the time.And most importantly each IPL match is basically as good as an international fixture between two teams ranked about 5-7 in the world. Each IPL team has four simply awesome international players and 1-2 awesome Indian players. That makes about 6 incredible players on a team and then 5 fillins. A mid ranked International team basically has about 3-4 star players and then 5-6 decent players and 1-2 rank players. My view is that by having a product of such high quality you are diminishing the edge International cricket has and pushing us towards a franchise model of cricket that someone on here was advocating at one point..
Of these, I only think #3 is a problem, and that happens maybe for 1-2 players a year.I wouldn't hate the IPL if the following didn't ocurr
1) The IPL getting a million teams in the champions league
2) Domestic teams getting denied their IPL players in the champions league
3) International test players choosing the IPL over playing in tests
4) And most importantly each IPL match is basically as good as an international fixture between two teams ranked about 5-7 in the world. Each IPL team has four simply awesome international players and 1-2 awesome Indian players. That makes about 6 incredible players on a team and then 5 fillins. A mid ranked International team basically has about 3-4 star players and then 5-6 decent players and 1-2 rank players. My view is that by having a product of such high quality you are diminishing the edge International cricket has and pushing us towards a franchise model of cricket that someone on here was advocating at one point..
5) So there is so flipping much of it and then turn around and the new season is starting again. You are going to make people sick of cricket.
oh my godThe IPL virtually created David Warner's international career and he's now a leading Test opener.
Yeah, there's flashes of quality amongst something that really only resembles County T20.Couldn't disagree more about this. It's about the only cricket on FTA in the UK so I've watched a fair bit of it in spite of the standard being pretty ****ing dreadful the majority of the time.
thats the worst post ive ever seen written about australian cricket, and ive read gimp posts on the subjectWho's gained the most from the IPL? We're not talking of boards or franchises, but countries' cricketing scenes. I feel it is Australia. The IPL virtually created David Warner's international career and he's now a leading Test opener. The flagging career of Shane Watson got new life in the IPL and so did Dirk Nannes', albeit to a limited extent in T20Is. Then Dave Hussey as a limited overs player, and also Cameron White. Plenty of fringe Aussie players have come up quickly this way.
It's also helped South Africa find and rediscover a few of their players. Some Lankans and West Indians have had a great time too, although none have used the IPL as a supply line or priming booth quite like Australia and South Africa. If the IPL ceased to exist, we'd know who'd get hit the most.
As an India supporter, I'm on the fence. IPL has brought home higher standards of cricket missing in the Indian domestic scene, but the way franchises operate, most young Indian players and domestic performers miss out on a lot, so not much of a positive here.
Haha, yeah right. As if these words when spoken by anyone could ever be true.As an India supporter, I'm on the fence.
As if you can readthats the worst post ive ever seen written about australian cricket, and ive read gimp posts on the subject