watson
Banned
Prefer Pollock at No.4 anyway as Barlow - Pollock - Faulkner - Procter make for a pretty ***y South African lineup.Yup. He got Tendulkar out of your grasp though
Prefer Pollock at No.4 anyway as Barlow - Pollock - Faulkner - Procter make for a pretty ***y South African lineup.Yup. He got Tendulkar out of your grasp though
You misunderstand. I want a batsman. The only bat left is a good chance of being Graeme ****ing S***h. I wouldn't vote for it.I think that you're being a bit 'glass half empty'. The only iffy player in that lineup is Amir which is not bad because everyone has an iffy player in their lineup. I've got George Thompson for example.
1. Hutton
2. Rowe
3. Hammond
4. Tendulkar
5. Kallis
6. De Villiers
7.
8. Lindwall
9. Turner
10. Amir
11. O'Reilly
Take a keeper. AB can't keep to O'Reilly anyways.You misunderstand. I want a batsman. The only bat left is a good chance of being Graeme ****ing S***h. I wouldn't vote for it.
That means a lot to me, ohno. ThanksE. Officially the worst team i've ever drafted, so well done Harsh.
True.A. Hope it's Prince, then the whole thing may not be tainted.
Also, people who assume a keeper you've never heard of is better than AB because he has a lower batting average - re think things. At no point has De Villiers been less than a good keeper.
If we're going by batting order:I reckon I win in 7/11 players over weeman