• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in England 2014

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Listen, for all that people are (deservedly) putting the boot into India, England deserve a **** ton of credit for the way they've fronted up given the 9 Test run they endured between Brisbane and Lord's. A bit of recognition for a great turnaround wouldn't go amiss.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Listen, for all that people are (deservedly) putting the boot into India, England deserve a **** ton of credit for the way they've fronted up given the 9 Test run they endured between Brisbane and Lord's. A bit of recognition for a great turnaround wouldn't go amiss.
to be fair, even strauss on sky comms can't seem to stop coming back to how amazingly horrible india were
 

Kirkut

International Regular
Players need to get their priorities right.

If they are not interested in tests, please openly convey. It's not that they will earn less if they won't play tests.
 

YorksLanka

International Debutant
Congrats to England on a deserved series victory. As for India,all I can say is pathetic-and that is coming from a non Indian. I expect Indian fans must be fuming -not at the loss but at the WAY their team surrendered.. Really poor..
 

LegionOfBrad

International Debutant
Sanga would have scored 2000 runs

Next Time Pakistan tours England, Mo Ameer will be back correct?
They're not here until 2016 so he will have served his ban. He may not get a visa though.

A conviction which resulted in a sentence of less than twelve months’ imprisonment** - Paragraph 320 (2)(d) and S-EC1.4(c) Appendix FM provides for a mandatory refusal of entry clearance where a person has been convicted of an offence and sentenced to less than 12 months’ imprisonment, unless a period of 5 years has passed since the end of the sentence.
He wasn't sent to jail until Nov 2011 so in theory its a mandatory refusal of entry.
 
Last edited:

Top