I'd say that his piss poor series in 2009 and 2013 didn't help matters. Thankfully, Strauss (2009), Bell and Pietersen (2013) rather papered over the fact he's rubbish vs quality fast bowling in England (his hundred in the Amla test is the exception). If he is to lead the team to success he needs to lead front the front to hurt the Aussies with big opening stands and hundreds.It's true, we've been really ****ed over by Cook not scoring tons in the last two home Ashes
Cook is a brilliant player of spin bowling. It has been about survival and not getting out vs pace. At the moment, I think he'll be rolled over by the Aussies and South Africans for very little next year.It's the same technique which he's used to cobble together, well, more Test hundreds than any of the other 664 men who've played Tests for England. More than Gooch, Gower, or Grace; more than Hobbs, Hutton or Hammond. He's been out of form and playing poorly. He's now back in form and playing better, against what I reckon (and perhaps I'm in a minority here) is a decent Indian pace attack in often helpful conditions. I think that's a good thing. The alternative which as I understand it you favour is that he fails abysmally, gets dropped from the team, miraculously reshapes his technique (at age 30), and returns to the team as a transformed player to win the Ashes. With all due respect, I think that's unrealistic. It's better for him and for the team for him simply to end his bad trot and to get back to the productive vein which has served him pretty well over the last 100 odd Tests.
The way that the same attack disembowelled him in 2013 shows either than Cook left outside off fantastically in 2010/11, or the Aussie bowling was piss poor against Cook in 2010/11. The discipline the Aussie bowlers showed in 2013/14 made me think that Cook was merely capitalising on bad bowling. He'd hardly scored a run against the Aussies before and after that series...Cook's scored plenty of runs against pace over the years. The 2010/11 Ashes showed that it's not simply a question of him surviving and not getting out against pace. There, it was a question of him ritually disembowelling a highly-regarded Australian pace attack (Mitch Johnson included) on Australian pitches for day after day after day.
Essentially, I think, it's about one team getting on top of another, grinding them down and breaking their spirit. That's what England did to Australia in 10/11, and the roles were reversed in 13/14.The way that the same attack disembowelled him in 2013 shows either than Cook left outside off fantastically in 2010/11, or the Aussie bowling was piss poor against Cook in 2010/11. The discipline the Aussie bowlers showed in 2013/14 made me think that Cook was merely capitalising on bad bowling. He'd hardly scored a run against the Aussies before and after that series...
Given that England don't play another test until WI in April next year, I think it's a moot pointEssentially, I think, it's about one team getting on top of another, grinding them down and breaking their spirit. That's what England did to Australia in 10/11, and the roles were reversed in 13/14.
And to return to the point, Cook failing now and being dropped over the winter seems to me to be a fairly poor way for him (or the side he captains) to prepare for an Ashes series.
Was sat at my dads as it happened and said only thing that saves him is it pitched outside leg as it hitting middle.It did look outside leg at first.
He's been failing forever and the ODI team is a separate entity (and largely rubbish)You're kidding. It'd be enormously disruptive and undermining for player, captain and team for him to fail and be dropped.