UnderratedSanity IMOWhat's next? Maximas despises Herath? Jono is a Kohli hater?
Not this bollocks again. There is absolutely no way anyone can say that he wouldn't average 100 in this era because the bloke was just that good.That's what Bradman would have averaged if he played the modern game. No, 65 after 75 or 62.5 after 100 is good enough to be the second best provided they don't have massive holes in the record.
All 4 of those players you mentioned were better than Sanga, and by a considerable margin.Maximas is just having a sook. The fact is that I called it at 50 and he's gone on and made it a 150 - probably a 200, taken his average past 59 and done so against one of the better off spinners the world has seen in Ajmal. But let's write it off right? Because we should always over-state the achievements of Tendulkar, Dravid, Lara and Ponting and understate those of Sanga.
Yeah, is that why they pale in comparison to almost every single statistic? The only person you could hope to say was better in his prime was Ponting due to the winning percentage his team had, but as for the other three, Sanga's winning percentage is higher, his centuries per innings is higher, his overseas average is higher, it goes on and on and on and on. At a time where Ponting and Tendulkar faded away with the resurgence of great pace bowling in the world, Sanga continues his march towards an average of 60.All 4 of those players you mentioned were better than Sanga, and by a considerable margin.
Yeah, Gilchrist was top class, really gave that Australian team (yet another) edge considering he generally came out and did it at near a run a ball too, but I don't think enough can be said about #3 batsmen who manage to average 55+... No protection in the case of an early wicket, straight out to bat.How good would his record be if he hadn't been a keeper for those 48 games?
Makes you appreciate Gilchrist even more when you compare his stats with Sanga as keeper. Also Prior to a lesser extent.
Not many keepers batted at 3 though. Makes a big difference when you don't have much of a break. Even Andy Flower batted at 4 as I recall. If anything you could say he was affected but not Gilchrist/Prior..Makes you appreciate Gilchrist even more when you compare his stats with Sanga as keeper. Also Prior to a lesser extent.
Agree, Sanga is as much a freak as Gilly in a different way.Not many keepers batted at 3 though. Makes a big difference when you don't have much of a break. Even Andy Flower batted at 4 as I recall. If anything you could say he was affected but not Gilchrist/Prior..
All 4 of those players you mentioned were better than Sanga, and by a considerable margin.
It's not particularly easy but this is a very familiar environment for Sanga, it's not an innings that should change anyone's mind on himps - anyone saying batting is easy out there, look at how well Ajmal is bowling with scarce reward.