Even worse when it buckets down straight away.Always a cringeworthy way to get out, caught at short fine leg
If the umpire had given him out and Eng had reviewed it would've stayed out, so I fail to see how the review was completely off.It was a ****e review, no chance that was hitting leg on a full red. Everyone knows Umpire's call gives them a fair margin.
Awful way to get out, should have been a boundary. Not sure this D/L thing Nasser is talking about will have much of an effect.
This is a strange way of looking at it to say the least. The decision was a dumb one because they should have known that it clearly wouldn't be hitting enough of the stumps, this stuff about 'oh well there've been worse reviews' is pretty irrelevantIf the umpire had given him out and Eng had reviewed it would've stayed out, so I fail to see how the review was completely off.
Yeah, the fact is that it wasn't given out, and it was pretty clear to the naked eye live that the decision wouldn't be overturned, when you only have one review in ODIs it's a bit silly to be gambling them away like thatIf the umpire had given him out and Eng had reviewed it would've stayed out, so I fail to see how the review was completely off.
Because it was never, ever going to be hitting the stumps enough to be a red.If the umpire had given him out and Eng had reviewed it would've stayed out, so I fail to see how the review was completely off.
Ok, maybe I didn't see it well enough on my small screen on the web, because it looked close enough to review for me. The commentators also seemed to think it was a fair review considering it was Bell as well.Because it was never, ever going to be hitting the stumps enough to be a red.
It's relevant because he was a well set batsman and probably Eng's best after Cook.Unless Ian Bell bats infront of bigger stumps, I don't see how that's relevant.
Interesting to see how many overs we lose.