Thats exactly what i was calling. He's easily already a better bowler than Anderson, and imo is going to catch Neesham sooner rather than later.Big call if you were meaning "test cricketer" but not exactly one if don't. Bowls quickish, has a few variations and can hit a big ball. Could see him playing 20/20 cricket within a year tbh. Isn't a patch on either Anderson or Neesham however.
A good old-fashioned game today, 220 plays 220, none of this 300 hit-a-6-every-2nd-over stuff. Enjoyed the radio commentary.Do the Wuzids and ND have any idea whether they'll be good or **** on any given day? I sure don't. ....
Blocky didA good old-fashioned game today, 220 plays 220, none of this 300 hit-a-6-every-2nd-over stuff. Enjoyed the radio commentary.
Did anybody here pick Santner earlier this season? 10-33-1 and 30 (39), tidy.
Well he is a bowling all-rounder....Thats exactly what i was calling. He's easily already a better bowler than Anderson, and imo is going to catch Neesham sooner rather than later.
Then why compare him to Anderson when they play completely different roles?Well he is a bowling all-rounder....
Neesham is better than Kuggs with bat and ball.If we were to play 2 allrounders like we did at the Basin, Kuggs is arguably a better choice than Neesham
I think Neesham has a higher ceiling but he sprays it around a lot.Neesham is better than Kuggs with bat and ball.
As does kuggsI think Neesham has a higher ceiling but he sprays it around a lot.
kugglejuggle doesn't?I think Neesham has a higher ceiling but he sprays it around a lot.
He was a project in Wellington, a big project especially when he got down there. He's a genuine first class cricketer now however IMO. 436 runs @ 36 and 29 wickets @ 31. For a kid that just turned 22 they make for pretty good reading. Over the last 18-24 months he would easily be the most improved cricketer in the country.I've always wanted to write off Kuggs but then he gets a little bit better while still being clearly in the project category.