I could've used that testimony when I picked Trumble in the last draftWhen we talk great Australian spinners, it's always the leggies. Warne, O'Reilly and MacGill. A forgotten man is off spinner Hugh Trumble. Tall, dour, deadly on older style wickets, Trumble took almost 5 wickets a test, was economical with the ball, and could bat too, making a couple of test fifties.
And Monty Noble's technique seems altogther unique;A tall man, he bowled offspin at close to medium pace with considerable variation in flight and pace. He turned the ball enough to beat the bat on true pitches, but on a wet wicket could make the ball bite, turn and lift spitefully. He fooled many a good batsman with a well disguised slower ball, often resulting in a caught and bowled. He was also a very useful batsman with 4 Test fifties and three first-class centuries to his name, mostly concentrating on defence.
With the ball Noble employed break-backs, although when the wicket was not offering assistance he preferred "spin-swerve".....Picking up a new grip from baseball, he was able to apply swerve to trick the batsmen. "Instead of pressing two or three fingers on the ball's seam, like a spinner, Noble held it between his thumb and his strong corn-studded forefinger," Robinson wrote. "On the truest of tracks all he needed was some sort of headwind for this spin-swerve to be difficult."
I was hoping he'd last. Sort of knew he wouldn't!Jack Gregory, 1890s.
Perhaps the most under-rated player in Test cricket in my opinion - in all of the various analyses I've bored the front-page readers with over the years, Gregory scores very highly, for example finishing third all-time in the Series Points ranking on a per-game basis. Scarily fast bowler in tandem with adopted Lanc Ted McDonald, in Tests he averaged nearly 37 with the bat and a shade over 31 with the ball (21 in all F/C). A great close fielder, he held 15 catches in one Ashes series.
Couldn't find a decent image of him bowling, unfortunately (or batting, for that matter).
View attachment 21220
Yeah, as was mentioned earlier it's a bit of thin decade - when guys born in this decade would have been at their peaks the Great War altered priorities somewhat.I was hoping he'd last. Sort of knew he wouldn't!
Great pick.Jack Gregory, 1890s.
Perhaps the most under-rated player in Test cricket in my opinion - in all of the various analyses I've bored the front-page readers with over the years, Gregory scores very highly, for example finishing third all-time in the Series Points ranking on a per-game basis. Scarily fast bowler in tandem with adopted Lanc Ted McDonald, in Tests he averaged nearly 37 with the bat and a shade over 31 with the ball (21 in all F/C). A great close fielder, he held 15 catches in one Ashes series.
Couldn't find a decent image of him bowling, unfortunately (or batting, for that matter).
View attachment 21220
Cheers mate.Great pick.
Go again kyear. Aubrey was one of chasingthedons early picks.Aubrey Faulkner 1880's
Sorry!Aubrey Faulkner 1880's
Another very underrated player - nice pick.Bruce Mitchell: 1900's
​ | <=1870s | 1880s | 1890s | 1900s | 1910s | 1920s | 1930s | 1940s | 1950s | 1960s | 1970s | >=1980s |
AldoRaine18 | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Ankitj | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Blakus | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
Camo999 | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Chasingthedon | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Fredfertang | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
Howe_Zat | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
Kyear2 | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Monk | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Morgieb | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
ohnoitsyou | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Pothas | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
Saint Kopite | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
watson | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |