chasingthedon
International Regular
Excellent idea for a draft this mate - the decades wrinkle really makes it difficult to choose.
its a pretty gun pair besides steyn being the stand out pick for his decade. The not disclosing the draft order is a great addition btw, a lot harder to planPEWS chose Steyn and Hadlee as his opening bowlers during one of Monk's 'real-time' drafts last year. I remember quite liking it at the time, so I've decided to plagarise it now
Yeah, the rules from this Draft create 12 'bottle-necks' by automatically excluding a load of players from a particular decade once you have picked a player. It also reminds me of Marcuss' recent 'Budget Draft' in that there are numerous ATGs that you'd love to pick but can't.Excellent idea for a draft this mate - the decades wrinkle really makes it difficult to choose.
Don't know of any website, Cricinfo or otherwise, that conveniently lists or searches birthdays. However, Wikipedia does have chronological lists of players from each nation. So it's just a matter of clicking on the player in the list to get their details;Does anyone know how to look up cricketers by birth dates on cricinfo? I am curious to find out who is the earliest born player to play test cricket. Someone born in 1840s I will guess.
what, take Davidson over Sobers?My experience with drafts has taught that there's always someone else with the same player in mind as you. Grab em when you can
Are you proposing a trade? I guess i could take Sobers of your hands....what, take Davidson over Sobers?
Pff keep dreamingAre you proposing a trade? I guess i could take Sobers of your hands....
What do the ratings measure?
Think of the Reliance Mobile ICC ratings as a system for identifying the players who could be selected for an ICC World XI if it was picked today. Take a look at the latest top tens, and you should find that most of the players at the top would be candidates for your current World XI. The ratings have often been described as a measure of form, but this is a simplification. A form rating would only look at what a player has done in (say) the last year, whereas our ratings take into account a player's entire career - though they put more emphasis on what he has done recently.
http://www.icc-cricket.com/player-rankings/faqs
What does it mean to have, say, 500 points?
Ratings points have a meaning in the same way as traditional averages do. Over 900 points is a supreme achievement. Few players get there, and even fewer stay there for long. 700 plus is normally enough to put a player in the world top ten. 500 plus is a good, solid rating.
http://www.icc-cricket.com/player-rankings/faqs
What is the best way to determine the "best players of all time". Can you produce a definitive list?
The ratings represent a player's standing have compiled a list of "best-ever ratings" which are effectively snapshots of greatness. When it comes to judging a player's greatness over his career, it's necessary to look at his entire graph rather than his peak. It's not so much how high a player gets as how long he stays there. If you think of a player's rating graph as being the shape of a mountain, then the greats will have graphs shaped more like Kilimanjaro than the Matterhorn. Hence Tendulkar would be deemed greater than Clyde Walcott despite the latter's higher peak. One way of assessing a player would be to calculate his 'average rating' over his career though of course this could penalize a player whose long career included a slow start. So it's over to you to make your own judgment by comparing graphs, or by other more subjective means.
http://www.icc-cricket.com/player-rankings/faqs
WAC!I fancy Dave will have BCL in mind as his next pick so
Brian Lara - 1960s