• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** 2014 Asia Cup

karan316

State Vice-Captain
I hope so too. However, Dhoni has little patience with wicket-taking bowlers who leak a lot of runs, and may opt for the slower and less effective Bhuvneshwar, which won't be a good idea. I too hope Aaron plays the whole tournament, but Pandey needs it more. Ideally, the pace attack should be Pandey-Aaron-Shami, in the lead up to the World Cup.
Bhuvneshwar is a pretty good option and should be a part of our bowling line up, his control, ability to swing the ball along with his recently improved death bowling makes him an important part of our attack. Pandey is not a good limited overs bowler, he is still very raw, but mostly he'll get a few chances to see what he can do. Aaron should definitely get a longer rope for the ODIs, looked a bit rusty against NZ, but he is a wicket taker and is much better than Umesh Yadav who is quite wayward. Shami's case is also a bit tricky, like most Indian bowlers, he has been poor in the death overs.
 
Last edited:

Esperance

U19 Cricketer
i think india will win, that is of course if they don't do badly; if they do badly, i do not think they will win.
 

ajdude

International Coach
i have no idea, i don't even know exactly what he's doing but all these bangladeshi fans are going nuts over it. i reckon it's hilarious haha, i was expecting him flipping the bird or something
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Bhuvneshwar is a pretty good option and should be a part of our bowling line up, his control, ability to swing the ball along with his recently improved death bowling makes him an important part of our attack. Pandey is not a good limited overs bowler, he is still very raw, but mostly he'll get a few chances to see what he can do. Aaron should definitely get a longer rope for the ODIs, looked a bit rusty against NZ, but he is a wicket taker and is much better than Umesh Yadav who is quite wayward. Shami's case is also a bit tricky, like most Indian bowlers, he has been poor in the death overs.
Bhuvneshwar has been terrible since the start of the ODI series at home against Australia. He struggles on any pitch that isn't slow and low. The figures give you a hint- high economy rate and barely a wicket a match. That's not good for a specialist bowler. His economy rate has soared lately, when he's out of his comfort zone. There's no point taking in a specialist bowler who doesn't take enough wickets.

I'd take Pandey's OD figures with a pinch of salt. OD series in India throw up oddball successes like Pritam Das, once a year. Or Jaydev Unadkat, with very good OD figures, but can't survive an entire ODI series. Most of the bowlers who have a great OD season are really not good enough to represent India, and I mentioned it at least once on the Indian Domestic Season thread. You have to make do with what you have in Ranji.

Both Aaron and Umesh have the potential to be competent, if not great, strike bowlers, and the combination can be quite productive, but they have been managed very poorly. There has to be a way to take care of their high economy rates, or occasional loose deliveries, and somehow milk their ability to chip wickets regularly, which isn't the case with some other bowlers with unquestioned places in the side. Likewise Shami, whose struggles in the closing overs are often the result of the spinners' struggles in the middle overs, when they go wicketless for long spells, but it's always the pacers in the closing overs who draw flak all the time.
 

Top