you've always hated james pattinson tbf. not a surprise you forgot him tbhYes that's possible also of course, in fact for some reason I didn't even think of Pattinson, and in probability I too would have Pattinson. I think it's more than a chance that Lyon won't play irrespective.
Refer to my things of note re: Clarke bowling.but then there's only 4 bowlers (plus noted medium pacer david warner).
Yeah but going with four bowlers could be an option if Watson is out. Going in with five bowlers anyway is an option too of course but with so many bowlers on tour, plus Henriques, that option was covered well enough without having to send anyone else over. Only having six fit batsmen there was an issue, especially since Lehmann hates Hughes.but then there's only 4 bowlers (plus noted medium pacer david warner).
certainly makes it less strangewouldnt be a lead up to an australian tour without talk of dropping lyon
this is why I support 7. MJ 8. Siddle 9. Harris 10. Pattinson ftr. Patto takes 5, siddle does little, NUFAN tastesSiddle can **** off for Patto btw.
Harris had rightfully claimed his spot in the batting order ahead of Siddle by the end of the Ashes.this is why I support 7. MJ 8. Siddle 9. Harris 10. Pattinson ftr. Patto takes 5, siddle does little, NUFAN tastes