Comprehensively wins the longevity argument in the WOAT debate.Its scary. The guy is only 25. He could legitimately get close to 100. That is seriously horrible.
Imagine the obligtory Cricinfo tribute articles
I don't follow anyone; it's on the cricinfo page under the "Cricketers on Twitter" thing.#followseveryone
Raina was nowhereWhere is rain when you need it.
Kallis I bet took longer.sharma will be the slowest to 150 test wickets ever?
Kallis was slower. Probably a fair few others too.sharma will be the slowest to 150 test wickets ever?
Nah hang on you're just as guilty of pre-empting Kallis' innings as a game saver for India.I blame this solely on Shri.
So, Ishant would make a pretty decent all-rounder if he averaged as much with the bat?Kallis, Sobers, Flintoff, Venkat, Shastri and Titmus all slower. Might be a couple I've missed because it was largely manual.
In terms of matches or in terms of overs?Kallis I bet took longer.
You know a bowler is **** when we're all taking solace in his average of ~ 38 being "ruined".So good Ishant is getting hit around even with only 58 to get. This match is ruining his average so hard. Its glorious.