Lol. Still a better bowling record than Andrew Flintoff.Let's not descend into hyperbole though. He may be a statto's wet dream, but a true allrounder he ain't.
Not in the 'Botham in his pomp' sense. But a very, very good batsman.
Nope.Let's not descend into hyperbole though. He may be a statto's wet dream, but a true allrounder he ain't.
Not without saying. Ponting was insane n the field and added a lot in that reguard. Lara was a hope for the WI a lot through his entire career, same for Tendulkar. Kallis is/was amazing but there's more than just batting and bowling in cricket. (yes I know he's a fair slipper)Extremely sad news
Goes without saying he added more value to a team than any Lara, Tendulkar or Ponting.
This news makes me even more angry about his joke second inning dismissal when he was looking in fine form.
to be fair, south africa is going to miss Kallis the bowler more than Kallis the batsman in immediate aftermath of his retirement.Kallis
165 matches, 13174 runs @ 55.12. 44 100's
To be fair, SA is going to miss Kallis the bowler more than Kallis the batsman in immediate aftermath of his retirement
Tendulkar
200 matches, 15921 runs @ 53.78. 51 100's
Ponting
168 matches, 13378 runs @ 51.85. 41 100's
ok now let's look at their bowling figures
The irony is that if he was a much worse batsman, say 35 avg, you'd be saying he's a true all rounderLet's not descend into hyperbole though. He may be a statto's wet dream, but a true allrounder he ain't.
Not in the 'Botham in his pomp' sense. But a very, very good batsman.
Yea that gets complicated, I rate Tendulkar, Lara and Ponting all above him as batsmen and Ponting and Lara ahead of him in the cordon and we all know what Tendulkar meant to Indian cricket so it is not that clear cut for me.Not without saying. Ponting was insane n the field and added a lot in that reguard. Lara was a hope for the WI a lot through his entire career, same for Tendulkar. Kallis is/was amazing but there's more than just batting and bowling in cricket. (yes I know he's a fair slipper)
The irony is that if he was a much worse batsman, say 35 avg, you'd be saying he's a true all rounder
Yeah, which is one of the several reasons why Sobers was better, but that's just a statistic in the end. 2 wickets a test at a good ER and average of just 32 is pretty damn good for a 5th bowler.Not at 1.8 wickets a test i wouldn't.