ohnoitsyou
International Regular
how the **** is he getting this much turn?
Serious question - who else could captain this side? It feels like only Chanderpaul, Bravo and Roach are guaranteed a place in the side and none of them strike me as captaincy material.As captain it's indisputably over. His place in the 11 should also be under question, though I don;t mind him staying in the squad.
So in the last 3 years, a period in which we've been indisputably poor in the opening department, Rutherford's average of 31, as the second best batsman in this shoddy era, earns him leniency?
It would be Ramdin.Serious question - who else could captain this side? It feels like only Chanderpaul, Bravo and Roach are guaranteed a place in the side and none of them strike me as captaincy material.
Rutherford is averaging about 24 since his debut innings over 10 tests ago. That's a pretty decent run - if someone else starts scoring big runs in first class cricket I don't think anyone could complain if Rutherford was replaced.
But no West Indian poster on here wants him in the side either!!It would be Ramdin.
They haven't played a test yet but it is obvious to everyone apart from the selectors that they are better options. Heck anyone who moves the ball at more than 75mph would be a better option right now let's face it. You watch Holder in the ODI series and tell me if Gabriel and Best are better options in these conditions.I would say that Roach and Rampaul are certainly the first choice seamers but have either Holder or Cummins even played a test? You can't just completely drop your whole pace attack at once.
Also, I'd like to point out that his bowling average is better than NZ's third seamer Neil Wagner.
Lords doesn't know ****.Lords says we can still lose this
If you remember how long we've been looking for decent openers, and how bad combinations have been in the past, I don't think we should take for granted actually how decent the Fulton-Rutherford partnership has been. Their ****ty modes of dismissals and general lack of huge opening stands have overshadowed the fact they've done a better job than anyone else really in the last few years. While I concede Rutherford may need to be dropped I also think due to the fact he's young, he can be worked on and turned into a successful opener. I think the season should be played out domestically and internationally. If at the end of the India series Rutherford hasn't got it together than the best opener from the PS should replace him in the following series.So in the last 3 years, a period in which we've been indisputably poor in the opening department, Rutherford's average of 31, as the second best batsman in this shoddy era, earns him leniency?
No. Hell no. Guptill and Flynn were dropped for similar mediocrity and he's had plenty of chances.
Fulton's been far better and dropping him wouldn't be justifiable.
nah WW and Beamer have (perhaps a touch begrudgingly) supported him. He's also undoubtedly the best keeper batsman in the Caribbean and not under threat from anyone.But no West Indian poster on here wants him in the side either!!
Yeah, she's never seen a diamond in the flesh!Lords doesn't know ****.
hendrix is spot on. Has to be Ramdin. He was one of our best ever Under 19 captains. He's averaged over 45 with the bat in the last 18 months so his place is secured. It's a no brainer.Serious question - who else could captain this side? It feels like only Chanderpaul, Bravo and Roach are guaranteed a place in the side and none of them strike me as captaincy material.
Yeah that's fair enough.If you remember how long we've been looking for decent openers, and how bad combinations have been in the past, I don't think we should take for granted actually how decent the Fulton-Rutherford partnership has been. Their ****ty modes of dismissals and general lack of huge opening stands have overshadowed the fact they've done a better job than anyone else really in the last few years. While I concede Rutherford may need to be dropped I also think due to the fact he's young, he can be worked on and turned into a successful opener. I think the season should be played out domestically and internationally. If at the end of the India series Rutherford hasn't got it together than the best opener from the PS should replace him in the following series.
I agree; but I don't believe in a wholesale change. Fulton doesn't deserve to be dropped but I think Rutherford should be given the next series, or at least the first Test, to make a century. Mind you, if he gets out first thing tomorrow his position may become untenable.Rutherford is averaging about 24 since his debut innings over 10 tests ago. That's a pretty decent run - if someone else starts scoring big runs in first class cricket I don't think anyone could complain if Rutherford was replaced.
Gibson's biggest crime IMHO. We cannot afford to throw away test class batsmen just because they are slightly complicated characters. A coach at test level should be a decent man manager who can get the best out of his most talented players. If you can't, you shouldn't be in the job. Gibson out!Bring back Sarwan.
really feel your pain on this one. Knowing there are quality batsmen that are fit but not in the team hurts the most.Gibson's biggest crime IMHO. We cannot afford to throw away test class batsmen just because they are slightly complicated characters. A coach at test level should be a decent man manager who can get the best out of his most talented players. If you can't, you shouldn't be in the job. Gibson out!