450 with 2+ days to go doesn't sound a solid enough target.Few showers forecast, so if they can get to 450 why not?
Sure do. This is going to be a long evening.The first 8 overs or so seem like a long time ago
Especially when rain generally appears late arvo/evening450 with 2+ days to go doesn't sound a solid enough target.
Some of the possible lost play can always be made up the next morning by starting 30 mins early.Especially when rain generally appears late arvo/evening
Bat all day today and hour or so tomorrow IMO
Think it was more to do with his economy than just because he was tall. Maybe his good economy is helped by his size.Tremlett has been crap for a while. Picking a bloke because he is tall is stupid. Who knew?
I've got the perfect solution; stay upI dread to think what score ill wake up to
Tremlett is a shadow of the bowler that he was here in 2010 - the "lost" 5 mph means batsman are comfortable getting forward to him whilst the short stuff is of no great concernI think Tremlett's looking a little bit one-dimensional these days. That might be a bit unfair in just judging him off this Test, but apart from trying to just hit good areas on a decent length and get a bit of extra bounce, I'm not sure what other plan he could utilise. It is a decent plan A mind. Nasser suggesting something different such as round the wicket and bang it in for a bit, but I think that'd be a waste with Tremlett, at 80mph bounce or not it won't phase either of these two batsmen. The bonus of Bresnan is that he can use the orthodox swing if that's around, he can bang the ball in and bounce players out, he can bowl a heavy ball on a length when the conditions aren't helping and he gets appreciable reverse, this is all when he is fully fit and on song though.
I could stay up no bother if there was no lunch break. It ****ing kills me, especially after an early start and a few light refreshments.I've got the perfect solution; stay up