Well I think that can only be a good thing really. If you're not getting properly forward you at least need to be as in line with the ball as possible.Yeah I'm used to that, but he seemed to have much more of a back and across movement than you usually see
Finn would be licking his lipsDon't know why Eng would worry about line and length
Just bowl ****ty, slow half-trackers and watch us implode seems a surer bet
If Clarke did it (set the field I mean) I reckon everyone would've loved it. Seriously.I can't believe that they gave Clarke the single when they're 250 runs behind.
Oh were they? You know throughout England's innings I can't recall a single LBW shout where the ball hit the pad. Siddle appealed once from memory, but the batsman hit it.Yeah they were making a fuss on TMS about how few reviews there have been, but it makes sense given the lack of lbw decisions. Which in turn is obviously down to the style of bowling favoured thus far.
so the only australian who hates trem is glenn archer ehGlenn Archer @GlennArcher11 1m
Seriously, how that tight shirt pie throwing Knob Tremlet can take a wicket is beyond me!
Nah no way. Anderson should have said no, I can get Clarke out too. Broad could give the batsman more set the single off his first ball if they felt the urgent need to bowl at Clarke.If Clarke did it (set the field I mean) I reckon everyone would've loved it. Seriously.
Nah still Cook's fault because he's so negative. Or something.ahahahaha broad demands another man get sent out deep
Yeah Aggers hates DRS so has been made up both days mentioning it. Ow only caught an hour of TMS, the last hour, on both days and he must have gone on about it ten timesOh were they? You know throughout England's innings I can't recall a single LBW shout where the ball hit the pad. Siddle appealed once from memory, but the batsman hit it.