and Watling ...For some reason our selectors prefer village cricketers like Nicol, and Devcich (to a lesser extent) than proper players like Rutherford.
Thanks goodness not for long... Nicol still at the other end too.
Yes, but both teams knew that, commentators mentioned it when NZ were over time when bowling. So NZ true target was always the DL mark somewhere between 20 - 25 overs. MoM = Matthews for getting his spinners to rip through to 20 over mark.That's just a ridiculous miscalculation by the officials. Would've struggled to make it through a 27 over a side match, let alone 33.
yet one that sl took seriouslyA suitably pathetic ending to suitably pathetic series.
Yet SL only managed a 1-1 draw at home against the worst ODI team NZ have ever fielded.yet one that sl took seriously
I was going to say "what about the 2003 tour to Pakistan when Astle + Fleming etc stayed home and we lost 5-0", but checked that team and it included Hamish Marshall, Cairns, Harris, Oran, B Mac and Vettori ... so I'd agree.... against the worst ODI team NZ have ever fielded.
tbf they probably got ****ed over by the weather worse overall than you guysyet one that sl took seriously
That was when Hamish Marshall was "discovered" I believe; batted well despite mediocre domestic returns and was given a run in the proper team as a result.I was going to say "what about the 2003 tour to Pakistan when Astle + Fleming etc stayed home and we lost 5-0", but checked that team and it included Hamish Marshall, Cairns, Harris, Oran, B Mac and Vettori ... so I'd agree.
Mills would have given his left nut to have players like Cairns, Oram or Vettori.I was going to say "what about the 2003 tour to Pakistan when Astle + Fleming etc stayed home and we lost 5-0", but checked that team and it included Hamish Marshall, Cairns, Harris, Oran, B Mac and Vettori ... so I'd agree.